Skip to main content
Glama
doer0312

ROS 2 Workspace Inspector MCP

by doer0312

Related Servers

Alternatives to ROS 2 Workspace Inspector MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables LLM coding agents to inspect, control, and verify remote ROS2 robotics applications without a local ROS2 installation, supporting topics, services, actions, parameters, TF transforms, and automated test suites.
      16
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A read-only MCP server that enables LLMs to inspect and analyze ROS 2 systems through natural language, covering nodes, topics, parameters, actions, rates, QoS, and environment health. It can run without ROS 2 installed and safely surfaces runtime system state for diagnosis.
      13
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI tools to interact with ROS2 robotics systems through natural language commands. Supports topic publishing/subscribing, service calls, message analysis, and auto-discovery of ROS2 interfaces for debugging and controlling robots.
      Mozilla Public 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables agents to inspect and analyze ROS recordings through MCP tools and resources, including topic indexing, frame/point-cloud/depth sampling, IMU/odometry series, calibration, and exportable clips, previews, and reports. It provides bounded queries and materialization of analysis artifacts without requiring a ROS installation.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A read-only MCP server that lets an AI agent inspect a ROS2 graph, its underlying DDS participants, readers, writers and QoS mismatches, and recorded bag files, with twelve typed tools that behave the same against a live robot or built-in mock fixtures. It has no write path at all, so it can never publish to the bus or command a robot.
      12
      3
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.6/5.0

    Scored across 7 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct aspect of ROS 2 workspace inspection: workspace-level scanning, package-level metadata, dependencies, interfaces, launch files, robot descriptions, and a cross-cutting diagnosis. No two tools overlap in purpose; even the diagnosis tool explicitly reuses the others but provides a different aggregated output.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case (scan_workspace, inspect_package, analyze_dependencies, inspect_interfaces, analyze_launch_file, inspect_robot_description, diagnose_workspace). The verbs vary semantically but the structural consistency and clear object nouns make prediction easy.

    Tool Count5/5

    Seven tools is an appropriate scope for a static analysis inspector, covering the key artifacts without fragmentation. Each tool has a clearly separate responsibility, and none feel redundant or extraneous.

    Completeness5/5

    The surface covers the major static analysis needs of a ROS 2 workspace: packages, dependencies, interfaces, launch files, and robot descriptions, plus a diagnostic aggregator. For a read-only inspection tool, there are no obvious missing operations that would cause dead ends.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues