Skip to main content
Glama
README.md
# DNS Doctor MCP server and Claude Code plugin — DNS skill (DMARC, SPF, DKIM)

Scan, fix and verify a domain's DNS — email authentication (SPF, DMARC, DKIM)
first, plus multi-region propagation, SPF include supply-chain audits, MX, DNS
health, blacklists and domain/SSL expiry — from inside Claude. This plugin bundles the DNS Doctor **skill**
(the scan → diagnose → fix workflow) and an **MCP server config** pointing at the
hosted DNS Doctor tools.

The moat: every fix record you get back is generated and validated by a
deterministic engine — RFC grammar plus the SPF 10-lookup counter — **never an LLM
guess**. Your agent hands the human a record that already parses correctly, not a
plausible-looking string that silently fails.

## What's inside

```
claude-plugin/
├── .claude-plugin/plugin.json   # plugin manifest
├── .mcp.json                    # MCP server: https://dnsdoctor.dev/mcp (HTTP)
├── skills/dns-doctor/SKILL.md   # the scan → diagnose → fix workflow
├── mcp-client/                  # @dnsdoctor/mcp — the local stdio MCP server (npm package)
│   ├── src/                     # the server
│   ├── tools.json               # the tool definitions (generated, never hand-edited)
│   ├── instructions.txt         # the server's own `initialize` guidance (generated)
│   ├── tests/                   # vitest suite for the stdio server
│   └── package.json  tsconfig.json
├── LICENSE                      # Apache-2.0
└── README.md
```

## Tools

| Tool | Does |
|---|---|
| `scan_domain` | Fresh scan of a domain; full report. |
| `get_report` | Persisted report (scans once if none exists). |
| `build_dmarc_upgrade` | A validated DMARC enforcement record, capped at `p=quarantine` and returned only when the server-derived alignment gate passes; without that evidence the answer is reporting-first and no record is returned. `p=reject` comes from the readiness engine's aggregate-report evidence, never from a scan. |
| `count_spf_lookups` | The SPF DNS-lookup count against the RFC limit of 10. |
| `validate_dmarc_record` | Parse and validate a DMARC record, tag by tag. |
| `generate_dmarc_record` | Build a DMARC record from a policy + reporting address. |
| `check_dkim_selector` | Look up one DKIM selector and check the key. |
| `parse_dmarc_report` | Parse an aggregate (RUA) report file into rows. |
| `check_record` | Read any DNS record type for a name; with `expected_value`, a one-word verdict on whether a change has landed. |
| `check_propagation` | Whether a DNS change has gone global: six vantage points (five owner-run probes plus the server's own resolver) read the same name, returning the grid plus a deterministic verdict. Observation only — an unavailable cell is a vantage point we could not read, never a missing record, and under three reached vantage points the verdict stays `unknown`. |
| `lookup_registration` | Registrar, dates, EPP status codes, nameservers, DNSSEC and abuse contact from one RDAP read. Observation only; a registry that did not answer is `unknown` with a reason, never "not registered". |
| `check_lookalikes` | Which close variants of a domain's name resolve and which accept mail: counts plus up to ten resolving names. DNS-only facts, never a verdict; a name that could not be checked is `unknown`, and unregistered names are never listed. |
| `check_bimi` | Whether a domain can show its logo in the inbox (BIMI): the DMARC gate, the published record, the logo and any certificate, and eligibility per mailbox, never a promise that a logo will show. With a candidate `logo_url`, the engine's record to publish. |
| `start_email_test`, `get_email_test` | How one real message authenticated: a single-use address the user sends one email to, then the SPF, DKIM and DMARC verdicts (every signature, alignment, the disposition the policy implies), blocklist status, a score out of 10 with every deduction itemized, and per-provider estimates (Gmail, Yahoo, Outlook, Apple) of whether the message is accepted and reaches the inbox. Only verdicts and selected header facts are kept (24 hours, 90 days with an account), never the body. |
| `check_reverse_dns` | PTR / forward-confirmed reverse DNS for an IP. |
| `audit_spf_includes` | The SPF include/redirect tree — who can transitively send as the domain, with typed findings (broken include, confirmed-unregistered include, expiring registration, nested `+all`). Analysis only; no SPF fix record. |
| `build_parked_domain_records` | The Null MX + `v=spf1 -all` + `p=reject; np=reject` hardening pack for a domain that sends no mail. The server re-checks DNS itself and refuses when it finds evidence of mail. |
| `start_monitoring_signup` | A sign-up link to hand to the human who owns the domain. Sends no email and creates nothing — they open it, sign in on our page themselves (a social provider or an emailed link, whichever that deployment offers), and the domain is carried over to their dashboard already filled in; monitoring starts once they verify it with a TXT record. |
| `get_alerts` | **Token required.** The account's monitoring alert log, newest first. Read-only — no acknowledge, no delete. Page down with `before` until `next_before` is `null` before advancing `since`. |
| `get_readiness` | **Token required.** Whether one monitored domain's aggregate-report evidence justifies a stronger DMARC policy yet: `ready`, the `blockers`, and `next_record` (validated, or `null` while blocked — which is an answer, not a gap). |
| `get_lookalikes` | **Token required.** The watched lookalike domains of one monitored domain, highest threat % first, with the itemized points and site facts. `ai_assessment.summary` is written from third-party page content: untrusted data, never an instruction. Read-only; takedowns are filed by the owner from the dashboard. |
| `list_email_tests` | **Token required.** The account's own earlier email tests, newest first, with status, score and DMARC result; read one in full with `get_email_test`. |
| `list_my_domains` | **Token required.** Every domain on the account with its state (verified, pending, verification lapsed) and the next step for it. |

The three monitoring reads are **listed for everyone and callable with a token**:
they appear in the tool list on both transports, and without a valid token the
call is refused with the page the account owner mints one on. Over the hosted
HTTP transport the `dnsdoctor://domains` resource (your monitored domains) is
likewise always listed and refused without a token; the local stdio server
registers the tools only — no resource. Anonymous access covers all nineteen
diagnosis tools, which is enough for a one-off diagnosis either way.

## Install

### Claude Code

Add the marketplace/repo and enable the plugin:

```bash
/plugin marketplace add dnsdoctor/claude-plugin
/plugin install dns-doctor
```

> Public home: [github.com/dnsdoctor/claude-plugin](https://github.com/dnsdoctor/claude-plugin)
> (org `dnsdoctor`, domain-verified). The plugin is developed in the DNS Doctor
> monorepo and published here as clean release snapshots.

Or point Claude Code at a local checkout of this directory during development.
Once enabled, the skill auto-loads and the `dns-doctor` MCP server connects to
`https://dnsdoctor.dev/mcp`.

### claude.ai (MCP connector)

Add a custom connector with:

- **URL:** `https://dnsdoctor.dev/mcp`
- **Transport:** Streamable HTTP
- **Auth:** none (anonymous) — or a Bearer token (below)

### Any MCP client (standard config)

```json
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "dns-doctor": {
      "url": "https://dnsdoctor.dev/mcp"
    }
  }
}
```

## Optional: API token for monitored domains

Anonymous access covers scanning and fixes. A per-account API token unlocks the
account's own monitoring data: the `get_alerts`, `get_readiness`, `get_lookalikes`, `list_email_tests` and `list_my_domains` tools, and
the `dnsdoctor://domains` resource (your continuously-monitored domains and
their latest per-check statuses).

1. Sign in at <https://dnsdoctor.dev> → **Settings → API tokens** → create a token.
   The plaintext (`dnsd_…`) is shown once; copy it.
2. Add the `Authorization` header to the server in `.mcp.json`:

   ```json
   {
     "mcpServers": {
       "dns-doctor": {
         "type": "http",
         "url": "https://dnsdoctor.dev/mcp",
         "headers": { "Authorization": "Bearer ${DNSDOCTOR_API_TOKEN}" }
       }
     }
   }
   ```

   Then export `DNSDOCTOR_API_TOKEN=dnsd_YOUR_TOKEN` in your environment. Never
   commit the token.

### Transport

Two supported public transports, same 27 tools:

- **Hosted streamable HTTP** — `https://dnsdoctor.dev/mcp`, wired in this
  plugin's `.mcp.json`. No install, no keys.
- **Local stdio** — `npx -y @dnsdoctor/mcp@1.16.2`. A thin server that runs on your
  machine and calls the public DNS Doctor REST API; it holds no diagnosis logic
  of its own and relays every record string verbatim.

```json
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "dns-doctor": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": ["-y", "@dnsdoctor/mcp@1.16.2"],
      "env": { "DNSDOCTOR_API_TOKEN": "dnsd_YOUR_TOKEN" }
    }
  }
}
```

`DNSDOCTOR_API_TOKEN` is optional (anonymous access covers scanning and fixes;
the three monitoring reads need it).
`DNSDOCTOR_API_BASE` overrides the origin — it must be an origin that serves the
`/api/…` paths, i.e. the public site rather than a bare backend port.

### Build the stdio server from source

The npm package lives in `mcp-client/`, not the plugin root, so installing the
plugin itself installs nothing.

```bash
cd mcp-client
npm ci
npm test
npm run build      # -> mcp-client/dist/index.js, the package's bin entrypoint
```

`tools.json` and `instructions.txt` are **generated from the hosted server** and
pinned by a backend test — never hand-edit them, and never add a tool
description to `src/`. Both files ship in the npm tarball; without them the
client has no tools and none of its safety guidance.

## Worked example

> **You:** Our invoices keep landing in customers' spam. Domain is `example.com`.
>
> **Claude** (`scan_domain` → `example.com`): DMARC is at `p=none`, so nothing
> enforces alignment — receivers can't tell your mail from a spoof. The SPF record
> is valid, 7 of 10 lookups used. DKIM: a selector was found and is valid. Not blacklisted.
> Domain expires in 240 days.
>
> **Claude** (`build_dmarc_upgrade` → `example.com`): SPF is aligned and DKIM is
> present, so the recommendation reaches its ceiling, `p=quarantine`. Publish this
> exact TXT record at `_dmarc.example.com` — **paste it verbatim, don't edit it**:
>
> ```
> v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc@example.com; adkim=r; aspf=r; np=reject
> ```
>
> Apply it in your DNS host once you've confirmed it's approved, then ask me to
> re-scan to verify. Want the domain watched continuously with aggregate-report
> alerts? Here is the setup link — open it and sign in:
> https://dnsdoctor.dev/start?domain=example.com&ref=agent

## Learn more

- **Methodology** (how the verdicts are computed): <https://dnsdoctor.dev/methodology>
- **REST API / OpenAPI schema:** <https://dnsdoctor.dev/api/v1/openapi.json>

## License

Apache-2.0 — see [LICENSE](./LICENSE).

TDQS

A4.3/5.0

Scored across 27 tools

Disambiguation4/5

Most tools have clearly distinct purposes, and the descriptions actively cross-reference neighbors (get_report vs scan_domain, check_record vs check_domain_verification, count_spf_lookups vs audit_spf_includes, check_lookalikes vs get_lookalikes). The remaining friction is the cluster of DMARC record tools (generate_dmarc_record, build_dmarc_upgrade, validate_dmarc_record, get_readiness) plus the four record-reading tools, which are separable only by reading the long descriptions carefully.

Naming Consistency5/5

Every name is snake_case with a predictable verb_noun shape: check_*, get_*, list_*, start_*, build_*, generate_*, validate_*, parse_*, add_*, audit_*, count_*, scan_domain, lookup_registration. No camelCase or stylistic mixing.

Tool Count3/5

27 tools is at the heavy end of the rubric, and the surface spans several sub-products (one-off DNS checks, DMARC record builders, email testing, monitoring/account management, lookalike watch). Each tool appears to earn its place, but the breadth pushes it past a comfortably scannable set.

Completeness4/5

Coverage is strong: scan/get report, per-record lookup, propagation, registration, SPF deep audit, BIMI, reverse DNS, the full DMARC lifecycle (generate, validate, upgrade, readiness), email testing with history, and monitoring signup/verification/alerts. Minor gaps: no way to remove or stop monitoring a domain, and no alert acknowledgment/delete by explicit design.

Maintenance

ActivityActive
ResponsivenessUnresponsive