Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to DNS Doctor

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for email deliverability: validate SPF/DKIM/DMARC/BIMI, check blacklists, test SMTP/IMAP, look up DNS, and generate ready-to-deploy records for any major email provider. Ships with two one-click prompts (audit-deliverability, setup-dns). Public, no auth.
      17
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server for domain intelligence — WHOIS, DNS records, SSL certificate inspection, SPF/DMARC validation, security-header audits, and blacklist/reputation checks, callable by AI agents. Powered by domainintel.app; runs server-side, no local setup.
      7
      28 npm
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for inspecting email domains and addresses, providing objective domain-level email infrastructure answers such as MX, SPF, DMARC, MTA-STS, and disposable-domain evidence.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server that lets agents check domain email authentication (SPF, DKIM, DMARC, MX) via a free API, returning grades and shareable report URLs. Also provides tools for listing paid services and partner program terms.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server that checks SPF, DKIM, DMARC, and MX records for a domain, returning a health verdict and specific DNS fixes to improve email deliverability.
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.4/5.0

    Scored across 25 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct, well-scoped purpose. Even the closest pairs are explicitly differentiated in their descriptions: get_report vs scan_domain (cached read vs fresh scan), check_record vs check_propagation (single record vs global agreement grid), and count_spf_lookups vs audit_spf_includes (lookup counting vs supply-chain walk). Names and descriptions unambiguously signal when to use which.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The overwhelming majority follow a consistent verb_noun pattern: check_propagation, add_monitored_domain, build_dmarc_upgrade, get_alerts, scan_domain, parse_dmarc_report. A few read as noun-phrases or drop the verb (get_lookalikes is fine, but check_domain_verification and count_spf_lookups are consistent; the minor wrinkle is that 'start_email_test' vs 'get_email_test' vs 'list_email_tests' form a micro-family that is still predictable). Overall highly readable and consistent.

    Tool Count4/5

    25 tools is at the upper end of comfortable for a DNS/email-authentication server that legitimately spans propagation, SPF/DKIM/DMARC, monitoring, lookalikes, reverse DNS, registration and email testing. Every tool maps to a real sub-domain, but the count is heavy enough that a slimmer surface (e.g. merging report-read/scan or signup helpers) would reduce load. Still justified by scope.

    Completeness5/5

    The surface covers the full domain lifecycle: observation (check_record, check_propagation, lookup_registration, check_reverse_dns), record generation (generate_dmarc_record, build_dmarc_upgrade, build_parked_domain_records), validation (count_spf_lookups, validate_dmarc_record), monitoring (add_monitored_domain, start_monitoring_signup, check_domain_verification, get_readiness, get_alerts), and reporting (scan_domain, get_report, parse_dmarc_report). No obvious dead ends for the stated DNS-doctor purpose.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessNo issues