Skip to main content
Glama

solve_knapsack_problem_tool

Maximize value by selecting items under weight and volume constraints for cargo loading, portfolio selection, resource allocation, advertising planning, menu planning, and inventory optimization.

Instructions

Solve knapsack optimization problems using OR-Tools.

    This tool solves knapsack problems where items need to be selected
    to maximize value while staying within capacity constraints.

    Use cases:
    - Cargo loading: Optimize loading of trucks, ships, or planes by weight and volume
    - Portfolio selection: Choose optimal set of investments within budget constraints
    - Resource allocation: Select projects or activities with limited budget or resources
    - Advertising planning: Choose optimal mix of advertising channels within budget
    - Menu planning: Select dishes for a restaurant menu considering costs and popularity
    - Inventory optimization: Decide which products to stock in limited warehouse space

    Args:
        items: List of items, each with 'name', 'value', 'weight', and optionally 'volume', 'quantity'
        capacity: Weight capacity constraint
        volume_capacity: Volume capacity constraint (optional)
        knapsack_type: Type of knapsack problem ('0-1', 'bounded', 'unbounded')
        max_items_per_type: Maximum items per type for bounded knapsack

    Returns:
        Knapsack result with total value and selected items

    Example:
        # Select items to maximize value within weight limit
        solve_knapsack_problem(
            items=[
                {"name": "Item1", "value": 10, "weight": 5, "volume": 2},
                {"name": "Item2", "value": 15, "weight": 8, "volume": 3},
                {"name": "Item3", "value": 8, "weight": 3, "volume": 1}
            ],
            capacity=10,
            volume_capacity=5
        )
    

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
itemsYes
capacityYes
volume_capacityNo
knapsack_typeNo0-1
max_items_per_typeNo
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden. It states the tool solves knapsack problems maximizes value within capacity, but does not disclose potential side effects, time complexity, or permissions. It is adequate but not detailed.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is well-structured with a summary, use cases, args, returns, and example. It is slightly lengthy but every section serves a purpose. The key information is front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's complexity (knapsack with multiple types and constraints) and the absence of an output schema, the description covers input parameters, provides a return description, and includes an example. Missing default values for knapsack_type, but overall complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters5/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Despite schema description coverage of 0%, the description thoroughly explains each parameter in the 'Args' section, including types and constraints (e.g., 'items' list with fields, 'knapsack_type' options). It adds significant meaning beyond the bare schema titles.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool solves knapsack optimization problems using OR-Tools. It lists specific use cases like cargo loading and portfolio selection, distinguishing it from sibling tools that handle other optimization problems.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides a list of use cases (cargo loading, portfolio selection, etc.) that imply when to use this tool. However, it does not explicitly state when not to use it or compare it to alternatives, which would strengthen guidelines.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/dmitryanchikov/mcp-optimizer'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server