stop_coolify_service
Stop a running Coolify service by specifying its UUID, enabling lifecycle control of self-hosted Supabase applications.
Instructions
Stop a Coolify service
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| uuid | Yes | Service UUID |
Stop a running Coolify service by specifying its UUID, enabling lifecycle control of self-hosted Supabase applications.
Stop a Coolify service
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| uuid | Yes | Service UUID |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description must bear full burden. It does not disclose side effects (e.g., service downtime, data loss requirements), whether it is graceful or forceful, or any required permissions. Only states the basic action.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence with no wasted words, but slightly under-specified given the action's potential impact. Still, it is appropriately front-loaded and concise.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the tool is a state-changing operation with one required parameter and no output schema, the description lacks crucial context about effects, error cases, or return values. Incomplete for agent decision-making.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% (one parameter 'uuid' described as 'Service UUID'). The description adds no additional meaning beyond what the schema provides, so baseline 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Stop a Coolify service' states the action (stop) and resource (service) clearly. The name itself distinguishes it from sibling 'stop_coolify_application', though the description does not explicitly differentiate them.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus other stop tools (e.g., stop_coolify_application) or alternatives. No context about prerequisites or post-conditions.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/dj-pearson/supabase-coolify-mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server