view_cart
View the items in your shopping cart to review selected products before proceeding to checkout.
Instructions
View the contents of the shopping cart
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
View the items in your shopping cart to review selected products before proceeding to checkout.
View the contents of the shopping cart
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are present, so the description carries the full burden. 'View the contents' implies a non-mutating read, but it does not disclose the output format, whether a session is required, or any other behavioral details.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, front-loaded sentence with no filler. Every word contributes to understanding the tool's purpose.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple, parameterless view operation, the description is largely complete. Some context about return value or session requirements could improve it, but the core action is fully specified.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The tool takes zero parameters, so there is nothing for the description to add. The schema is also empty with 100% description coverage, and the baseline for a no-parameter tool is 4.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description uses a specific verb ('View') and a clear resource ('the contents of the shopping cart'), making the tool's function immediately obvious. It also distinguishes itself from sibling tools like add_product_to_cart and browse_products by focusing on the cart's current contents.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It does not mention prerequisites such as logging in or prior cart actions, nor does it name alternative tools for other cart operations.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/devqa07/playwright-automation-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server