delete_webhook
Delete a specific webhook endpoint by providing its unique ID.
Instructions
Delete a webhook endpoint.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| webhook_id | Yes |
Output Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| result | Yes |
Delete a specific webhook endpoint by providing its unique ID.
Delete a webhook endpoint.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| webhook_id | Yes |
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| result | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description must disclose behavioral traits, but it only says 'Delete', which implies destruction. There is no mention of irreversibility, permissions, or impact on related resources.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is short at one sentence, but it sacrifices necessary detail for brevity. It is not verbose but lacks completeness.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the tool's simplicity, the description fails to cover return values (despite an output schema) and assumes common knowledge about webhook deletion. The description alone is incomplete.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Despite 0% schema coverage, the description adds no meaning to the webhook_id parameter beyond its name. No format, validation, or identification context is provided.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the verb 'Delete' and the resource 'webhook endpoint', distinguishing it from sibling tools like create_webhook, get_webhook, etc.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool, prerequisites, or alternatives. The agent receives no context about when deletion is appropriate or what side effects to expect.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/devhelmhq/mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server