Skip to main content
Glama
devhelmhq

DevHelm MCP Server

Official
by devhelmhq

create_alert_channel

Create alert channels for email, Slack, PagerDuty, and other services to send incident notifications to your team.

Instructions

Create a new alert channel.

Required: name, type, config (type-specific). Types: EMAIL, WEBHOOK, SLACK, PAGERDUTY, OPSGENIE, TEAMS, DISCORD, TELEGRAM, GOOGLE_CHAT, PUSHOVER, MATTERMOST, SPLUNK_ONCALL, PUSHBULLET, LINEAR, INCIDENT_IO, ROOTLY, ZAPIER, DATADOG, JIRA, GITLAB.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
bodyYes

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
resultYes
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, and the description does not mention any behavioral traits such as authentication requirements, rate limits, error handling, or what happens if config is invalid.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Short and to the point, with the core action front-loaded. The list of types is comprehensive but could be abbreviated or referenced.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the complexity (nested config objects, many types, output schema exists), the description lacks details about return values, errors, and does not explain how to choose a type.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters2/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description mentions 'name, type, config' but the schema has no 'type' field; it's inside config as channelType. This inaccuracy could mislead. Schema coverage is 0%, and the description adds little value beyond listing types.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action 'Create a new alert channel' and lists the required fields and supported types, distinguishing it from sibling tools like create_monitor.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Implicitly indicates when to use: when you need to create an alert channel. Lists required parameters and supported types, but lacks explicit guidance on alternatives or when not to use.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/devhelmhq/mcp-server'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server