bricks_update_settings

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so the description carries full burden. It mentions 'Supports merge mode (default)' which is a behavioral trait, but does not disclose potential side effects, reversibility, or required permissions. The description adds some context beyond a bare 'update' but misses comprehensive behavioral detail.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise with two sentences. It front-loads the purpose, then adds merge mode and examples. No wasted words, every sentence adds value.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has 2 parameters and no output schema or annotations, the description covers the main functionality adequately. It explains the merge mode and provides examples, but lacks information about the return value or error handling, which would increase completeness.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with clear parameter descriptions. The description adds value by providing concrete examples of valid settings keys ('container width, post types, disabled features'), which aids the agent in understanding what to put in the 'settings' object.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Update' and resource 'Bricks Builder global settings'. It provides specific examples like 'container width, post types, disabled features' and distinguishes from siblings such as 'bricks_get_settings' (reading settings).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description indicates when to use this tool: for updating global settings. It mentions merge mode as default usage but does not explicitly state when not to use or compare to alternatives like 'bricks_update_page_settings'. The context is clear but lacks exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.