b24_tasks_create

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It mentions that the tool creates a task, but does not disclose authentication requirements, the read-only fallback without a personal webhook, side effects, or what response to expect.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single concise sentence that front-loads the core action and lists relevant fields without unnecessary detail. Every word contributes to the basic understanding of the tool.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a create operation with no annotations, no output schema, and a nested 'fields' parameter, the description is too thin. It does not mention that TITLE is required, that a personal webhook is needed for write access, or how the webhook parameters interact with the creation request.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 67%, with 'fields' and 'personal_webhook' already explained in the schema. The description restates some of those field meanings in plain language but adds little beyond that, and it does not clarify webhook_url or the nested object structure meaningfully.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb ('Crea') and resource ('una nueva tarea') and lists key fields, making the tool's purpose immediately clear. It naturally distinguishes the create action from sibling tools like b24_tasks_update, b24_tasks_complete, and b24_tasks_list.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies use when creating a task, but it does not explicitly state when to choose this tool over alternatives like b24_tasks_update or b24_tasks_complete. It also omits practical prerequisites such as the need for a write-capable personal webhook.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.