b24_products_update

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

There are no annotations, so the description carries the behavioral disclosure burden, but it only says 'actualiza un producto'. It does not mention write permissions, the personal_webhook requirement for non-read-only updates, partial vs full field replacement, or what the response contains.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single compact sentence with no filler, and the verb-action structure is front-loaded. However, it is so minimal that it borders on under-specification, so it is not a perfect example of effective structure.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For an update tool with four parameters, no annotations, and no output schema, a one-line description is not sufficiently complete. Missing context includes required field semantics, webhook behavior, side effects, and expected return value.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description adds no meaning to the parameters. With only 50% schema coverage, the required id and fields remain only schematically defined, and webhook_url is entirely undescribed; the description does not compensate for that gap.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific action ('actualiza') and a clear resource ('producto del catálogo'), so an agent can tell this is an update operation. It does not explicitly contrast with b24_products_create/get/list, but the verb and resource make the purpose unambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is given about when to use this tool instead of b24_products_create, b24_products_get, or b24_crm_update. The context must be inferred entirely from the tool name and sibling list.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.