A
licenseA
qualityB
maintenanceExposes the Maester security test framework for Microsoft 365/Entra/Defender as MCP tools, enabling AI agents to run tests, audit AI agents and MCP servers, and investigate security posture.
9
MIT
m365-audit-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to m365-audit-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceExposes Azure AI Foundry agents, workflows, and AI Search vector-database capabilities as MCP tools, enabling natural language interaction with agents, semantic search, and index management.102MIT
- AlicenseDqualityBmaintenanceEnables MCP clients to securely access and operate a Microsoft 365 tenant through the full Microsoft Graph API, covering mail, calendar, files, Teams, SharePoint, Planner, OneNote, Excel, admin, security, and more with 219 tools and guarded write capability.219MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables natural-language queries about Azure resource compliance, including VM compliance, patch status, orphaned RBAC, and infrastructure health, through read-only MCP tools.3MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables MCP-compatible agents to query security checklists, protocols, and framework mappings to safely build and operate AI agents, with tools for checklist runs, protocol lookup, mapping lookup, and threat search.9CC BY-4.0
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP-native auditor for LLM hallucination and grounding issues in RAG systems. Provides prioritized findings in table, JSON, or SARIF format for CI gating and AI agent integration.-
TDQS
A4.1/5.0
Scored across 5 tools
Disambiguation5/5
Each tool targets a distinct aspect of M365 auditing: conditional access policies, tenant privacy config, orphaned documents, DLP policies, and Copilot usage. There is no overlap or ambiguity between them.
Naming Consistency5/5
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (audit_, check_, find_, list_, summarize_) using snake_case, making them predictable and easy to distinguish.
Tool Count5/5
With 5 tools covering different audit domains, the count is well-scoped for an audit-focused MCP server. Each tool serves a clear purpose without redundancy.
Completeness3/5
The tools cover key audit areas (conditional access, privacy, orphaned docs, DLP, Copilot) but lack common audit tasks like user activity logs, sharing policy audits, or admin role reviews. Several important audit dimensions are missing.
Maintenance
ActivityStale
ResponsivenessNo issues