azure-compliance-mcp
Click on "Install Server".
Wait a few minutes for the server to deploy. Once ready, it will show a "Started" state.
In the chat, type
@followed by the MCP server name and your instructions, e.g., "@azure-compliance-mcpWhich VMs are non-compliant with policy?"
That's it! The server will respond to your query, and you can continue using it as needed.
Here is a step-by-step guide with screenshots.
azure-compliance-mcp
Honest Azure compliance for LLM agents — ask infra-health questions in plain English and get answers that distinguish a real
failfrom anot_evaluable, and never fake apass.
An MCP server, built with FastMCP 3.x, that exposes read-only Azure resource-compliance data so an agent can answer questions like "which storage accounts allow TLS 1.0?" or "which VMs have no disk encryption?" — each finding tagged with where the verdict came from and whether it could be evaluated at all.

Why honest compliance?
Most tooling collapses "compliant", "non-compliant", and "couldn't tell" into a single pass/fail bit — so a control it can't actually measure silently shows green. This server refuses to guess:
fail— positive evidence a protection is absent (e.g.encryptionAtHost = false). Actionable; shows up in the default view.not_evaluable— the signal genuinely isn't in the data (e.g. no guest-config policy assigned). Surfaced explicitly, never as a pass.source— every finding records its provenance:arg|azure_policy|defender.
Related MCP server: Azure Assistant MCP
Quickstart
Requires uv and Python 3.12+. Runs out of the box — mock mode needs zero Azure setup.
uv sync # install dependencies
uv run python scripts/demo.py # fastest look — runs the tools against mock data
uv run server.py # mock data, stdio transport — works immediatelyPoint it at your own tenant when you're ready:
uv run server.py --mode live # real Azure Resource Graph (e.g. after `az login`)
uv run server.py --transport http # remote: Streamable HTTP
uv run fastmcp dev inspector server.py # explore the tools interactivelyLive mode authenticates with DefaultAzureCredential against your own tenant and is strictly read-only.
Architecture
Tools depend only on a Provider protocol, never on a concrete data source — so the same tool code runs against synthetic mock data or live Azure Resource Graph (ARG), selected at startup with --mode.
flowchart LR
Agent["LLM agent / MCP client"] -->|stdio · HTTP| Server["FastMCP server\n(check_compliance, query_resources)"]
Server --> Protocol["Provider protocol\n(read-only)"]
Protocol -->|--mode mock| Mock["MockProvider\nseeded ARG-shaped data"]
Protocol -->|--mode live| Live["LiveProvider\nDefaultAzureCredential"]
Live -->|injection-safe KQL| ARG[("Azure Resource Graph\nresources · policyresources")]Controls (check_compliance evaluates five):
control | source | signal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transports: stdio (default, local) and Streamable HTTP (remote, intended behind OAuth 2.1). In stdio mode stdout is reserved for the protocol — logging goes to stderr only.
See SPEC.md for the full tool contracts.
Design decisions & tradeoffs
Mock provider is the default. The repo runs with zero Azure account, credentials, or network — so reviewers, CI, and new contributors get meaningful output immediately. The mock dataset is shaped exactly like ARG rows, so one mapping serves both modes.
Read-only by construction. No tool can create, update, or delete a resource. The live path only ever issues ARG queries; there is no mutation surface to misuse.
Control-based, not Azure-Policy-based. Compliance is evaluated from resource configuration (the ARG row), so it works even when no Azure Policy is assigned — except where the signal genuinely lives elsewhere (guest-config), which routes to
policyresourcesand is honest about it.The
not_evaluable+sourcehonesty model. A third status plus a provenance field means the agent can tell "this is broken" from "I can't see this from here" — the core reason to trust the output.KQL pushdown for scale. Live filters (
query_resources) are pushed into the ARG query (where+take) rather than fetched-then-filtered, so large tenants stay cheap. An opt-in contract test asserts the pushdown matches the reference Python filter, so both modes stay provably consistent.Injection-safe escaping. ARG has no bind parameters, so every user-supplied value is encoded as an escaped KQL string literal — never concatenated raw. (ARG is read-only regardless, but the discipline is enforced and unit-tested.)
Status & roadmap
v0.2.0 — check_compliance and query_resources shipped (mock + live), honest not_evaluable/source model, KQL pushdown, CI on every PR.
Next:
get_patch_status— patch/update assessment across VMsfind_orphaned_rbac— role assignments pointing at deleted principalssummarize_health— rolled-up infra-health summaryevals — task-level evaluation of agent answers over the mock dataset
Development
uv run pytest # tests (live tests are opt-in: RUN_LIVE_TESTS=1)
uv run ruff check . # lint
uv run ruff format --check . # formatSecurity
All Azure tools are read-only — nothing in this server modifies Azure resources.
Secrets, tenant IDs, and
.envare gitignored and must never be committed; live mode uses only your localDefaultAzureCredential.In stdio mode, logging goes to stderr only (stdout is reserved for the protocol).
License
Maintenance
Resources
Unclaimed servers have limited discoverability.
Looking for Admin?
If you are the server author, to access and configure the admin panel.
Latest Blog Posts
- Your AI Chatbot Just Exposed Your CEO's Salary to an InternBy Om-Shree-0709 on .Agent IdentityMCP SecurityOAuth Delegation
- Why MCP Servers Need Execution Sandboxing (And Why Your Current Stack Isn't Enough)By Om-Shree-0709 on .Agentic AiPrompt InjectionWebAssembly
MCP directory API
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/vivekanjana76/azure-compliance-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server