zenhub_get_user_workspaces

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided. The description fails to disclose behavioral traits such as authentication requirements, pagination (despite the 'first' parameter), or that the 'query' parameter filters results. The agent may expect all workspaces but the tool might paginate.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence with no unnecessary words. It is appropriately front-loaded but could benefit from a brief mention of parameter effects.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

No output schema is provided. The description is minimal and does not cover pagination behavior or how the query parameter functions. For a simple read tool, it is barely adequate.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% and the parameter descriptions in the schema are clear. The tool description adds no additional meaning beyond what the schema already provides. Baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses specific verb 'Get' and resource 'workspaces accessible to the current user', clearly distinguishing it from sibling tools like zenhub_get_organization_workspaces which require organization context.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description does not provide explicit when-to-use or when-not-to-use guidance. It is implied that this tool is for retrieving workspaces the current user can access, but no alternatives or exclusions are mentioned.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.