zenhub_create_sprint

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description must disclose behavioral traits. It only says 'Create a new sprint' without mentioning side effects, authorization needs, or consequences (e.g., whether it closes previous sprints). Very opaque.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single sentence, no fluff. It is concise and to the point, though it could arguably be too brief. Still earns a 4 for efficiency.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Despite having 6 parameters and nested objects, the description provides no context about what a sprint is, what happens on creation, or the response. Very incomplete for the tool's complexity.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 83%, so the schema already describes most parameters. The description adds no extra meaning. Baseline is 3; description does not compensate for the few undocumented parameters (e.g., nested settings).

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Create a new sprint' clearly states the action and resource, distinguishing it from sibling tools like 'update_sprint'. It is not a tautology as it adds a verb, but it is minimal.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., zenhub_add_issues_to_sprints, zenhub_update_sprint). No context about prerequisites, permissions, or when not to use.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.