Skip to main content
Glama

add_permission_path

Grant read or write permission to a specific path in the current project, controlling access to project resources.

Instructions

Add path to project permissions.

Grants read or write permission for the specified path in the current project. Paths are stored in project configuration and enforced by the MCP server.

Arguments

  • permission_type (required): enum: 'read', 'write'

    • Permission type: 'read' or 'write'

  • path (required): string

    • Path to add to permissions

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
argsYesArguments for add_permission_path tool.

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
resultYes
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Discloses that paths are stored in config and enforced by server, but lacks details on overwriting behavior, path format, immediate effect, or auth requirements. No annotations to supplement.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness3/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

First paragraph is concise, but repetition of argument list from schema makes it longer than needed. Could be trimmed to just the first paragraph.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Covers parameter semantics well via schema, but missing context on cumulative permissions, conflicts, or prerequisites like active project. Has output schema but description does not mention return values.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. Description repeats schema verbatim without adding extra meaning or constraints beyond what schema provides.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states action (add), resource (path to project permissions), and effect (grants read/write permission). Distinguishes from sibling 'remove_permission_path'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Implies usage for granting path permissions but does not explicitly state when to use vs. alternatives or prerequisites. Missing 'when not to use' guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/deeprave/mcp-guide'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server