de en es ja ko ru zh

GitHub Enterprise MCP Server

Name: GitHub Enterprise MCP Server
Author: ddukbg

by ddukbg

Overview Schema Source Related Servers Discussions Admin

TypeScript

Remote

GitHub Enterprise MCP サーバー

GitHub Enterprise APIとの統合のためのMCP（Model Context Protocol）サーバー。このサーバーは、CursorからGitHub Enterpriseのリポジトリ情報、問題、PRなどに簡単にアクセスするためのMCPインターフェースを提供します。

互換性

このプロジェクトは主に GitHub Enterprise Server 環境向けに設計されていますが、以下の環境でも動作します。

GitHub.com
GitHubエンタープライズクラウド

注: 一部のエンタープライズ固有の機能 (ライセンス情報やエンタープライズ統計など) は、GitHub.com または GitHub Enterprise Cloud では動作しません。

Related MCP server: GitHub CLI MCP Server

主な特徴

GitHub Enterpriseインスタンスからリポジトリリストを取得する
詳細なリポジトリ情報を取得する
リポジトリのブランチを一覧表示する
ファイルとディレクトリの内容を表示する
問題とプルリクエストを管理する
リポジトリ管理（作成、更新、削除）
GitHub Actionsワークフロー管理
ユーザー管理（ユーザーの一覧表示、作成、更新、削除、一時停止/一時停止解除）
企業統計にアクセスする
強化されたエラー処理とユーザーフレンドリーな応答フォーマット

はじめる

前提条件

Node.js 18以上
GitHub Enterpriseインスタンスへのアクセス
個人アクセストークン（PAT）

Dockerのインストールとセットアップ

オプション1: Dockerで実行する

Docker イメージをビルドします。
```
docker build -t github-enterprise-mcp .
```

環境変数を使用して Docker コンテナを実行します。

docker run -p 3000:3000 \
  -e GITHUB_TOKEN="your_github_token" \
  -e GITHUB_ENTERPRISE_URL="https://github.your-company.com/api/v3" \
  -e DEBUG=true \
  github-enterprise-mcp

注：Dockerfileはデフォルトで--transport httpで実行されるように設定されています。これを変更する必要がある場合は、コマンドをオーバーライドできます。

docker run -p 3000:3000 \
  -e GITHUB_TOKEN="your_github_token" \
  -e GITHUB_ENTERPRISE_URL="https://github.your-company.com/api/v3" \
  -e DEBUG=true \
  github-enterprise-mcp node dist/index.js --transport http --debug

オプション2: Docker Composeを使用する

必要な環境変数を含む.envファイルをプロジェクトルートに作成します。

GITHUB_ENTERPRISE_URL=https://github.your-company.com/api/v3
GITHUB_TOKEN=your_github_token
DEBUG=true

Docker Compose を使用してコンテナを起動します。
```
docker-compose up -d
```
ログを確認します:
```
docker-compose logs -f
```
コンテナを停止します。
```
docker-compose down
```

インストールとセットアップ

ローカル開発（並行モードの使用）

自動再コンパイルとサーバーの再起動を伴うアクティブな開発には、この方法をお勧めします。

リポジトリをクローンし、必要なパッケージをインストールします。

git clone https://github.com/ddukbg/github-enterprise-mcp.git
cd github-enterprise-mcp
npm install

開発サーバーを実行します。
```
export GITHUB_TOKEN="your_github_token"
export GITHUB_ENTERPRISE_URL="https://github.your-company.com/api/v3"
npm run dev
```
これにより、次のようになります。
- ファイルが変更されたときに TypeScript コードを自動的にコンパイルする
- コンパイルされたファイルが更新されたらサーバーを再起動します
- URLベースの接続ではサーバーをHTTPモードで実行する
下記の説明に従ってURLモードを使用してカーソルに接続します

生産のためのインストールとセットアップ

オプション 1: URL モードの使用 (ローカル開発に推奨)

この方法は最も安定しており、ローカル開発やテストに推奨されます。

リポジトリをクローンし、必要なパッケージをインストールします。

git clone https://github.com/ddukbg/github-enterprise-mcp.git
cd github-enterprise-mcp
npm install

プロジェクトをビルドします。
```
npm run build
chmod +x dist/index.js
```

サーバーを実行します。

export GITHUB_TOKEN="your_github_token"
export GITHUB_ENTERPRISE_URL="https://github.your-company.com/api/v3"
node dist/index.js --transport http --debug

URL モードを使用してカーソルに接続します。
- カーソルの.cursor/mcp.jsonファイルに次のコードを追加します。
```
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "github-enterprise": {
      "url": "http://localhost:3000/sse"
    }
  }
}
```

オプション2: グローバルコマンドとしてインストールする (npm リンク)

この方法はローカル開発に役立ちます。

# After cloning the repository
git clone https://github.com/ddukbg/github-enterprise-mcp.git
cd github-enterprise-mcp

# Install required packages
npm install

# Build
npm run build
chmod +x dist/index.js

# Link globally
npm link

# Run as a global command
export GITHUB_TOKEN="your_github_token"
export GITHUB_ENTERPRISE_URL="https://github.your-company.com/api/v3"
github-enterprise-mcp --transport=http --debug

オプション3: npx を使用する (パッケージが公開されている場合)

パッケージがパブリック npm レジストリに公開されている場合:

npx @ddukbg/github-enterprise-mcp --token=your_github_token --github-enterprise-url=https://github.your-company.com/api/v3

AIツールとの統合

クロードデスクトップ

claude_desktop_config.jsonに以下を追加します。

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "github-enterprise": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": ["-y", "@ddukbg/github-enterprise-mcp", "--token=YOUR_GITHUB_TOKEN", "--github-enterprise-url=YOUR_GITHUB_ENTERPRISE_URL"]
    }
  }
}

YOUR_GITHUB_TOKENとYOUR_GITHUB_ENTERPRISE_URLを実際の値に置き換えます。

カーソル

推奨: URL モード (最も安定)

カーソルで最も信頼性の高い操作を行うには、URL モードの使用をお勧めします。

別のターミナルウィンドウでサーバーを起動します。

cd /path/to/github-enterprise-mcp
GITHUB_ENTERPRISE_URL="https://github.your-company.com/api/v3" GITHUB_TOKEN="your_github_token" node dist/index.js --transport http

カーソルの MCP 設定を構成します。
- カーソルを開いて設定へ移動します
- AI > MCPサーバーへ移動
- .cursor/mcp.jsonファイルを編集します。
```
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "github-enterprise": {
      "url": "http://localhost:3000/sse"
    }
  }
}
```
変更を適用するにはカーソルを再起動してください

代替手段: コマンドモード

あるいは、コマンドモードを使用するように Cursor を構成することもできますが、URL モードの方が信頼性が高いです。

カーソルを開いて設定へ移動します
AI > MCPサーバーへ移動
MCPサーバーの追加をクリック
次の詳細を入力してください。
- 名前: GitHub Enterprise
- コマンド: npx
- 引数: @ddukbg/github-enterprise-mcp
- 環境変数:
  - GITHUB_ENTERPRISE_URL : GitHub Enterprise API の URL
  - GITHUB_TOKEN : GitHub個人アクセストークン

あるいは、 .cursor/mcp.jsonファイルを手動で編集して、次の内容を含めることもできます。

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "github-enterprise": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "@ddukbg/github-enterprise-mcp"
      ],
      "env": {
        "GITHUB_ENTERPRISE_URL": "https://github.your-company.com/api/v3",
        "GITHUB_TOKEN": "your_github_token"
      }
    }
  }
}

言語設定

このMCPサーバーは英語と韓国語の両方をサポートしています。言語は以下の方法で設定できます。

環境変数

# Set language to Korean
export LANGUAGE=ko

# Or in .env file
LANGUAGE=ko

コマンドライン引数

# Set language to Korean
node dist/index.js --language ko

指定されていない場合はデフォルトの言語は英語になります。

HTTPモードの追加オプション

--debug : デバッグログを有効にする
--github-enterprise-url <URL> : GitHub Enterprise API URL を設定する
--token <TOKEN> : GitHub個人アクセストークンを設定する
--language <LANG> : 言語を設定します (en または ko、デフォルト: en)

利用可能なMCPツール

この MCP サーバーは次のツールを提供します。

ツール名	説明	パラメータ	必要なPAT権限
`list-repositories`	ユーザーまたは組織のリポジトリリストを取得する	`owner` : ユーザー名/組織名`isOrg` : 組織かどうか`type` : リポジトリの種類`sort` : 並べ替えの基準`page` : ページ数`perPage` : ページあたりの項目数	`repo`
`get-repository`	詳細なリポジトリ情報を取得する	`owner` : リポジトリの所有者`repo` : リポジトリ名	`repo`
`list-branches`	リポジトリのブランチを一覧表示する	`owner` : リポジトリの所有者`repo` : リポジトリ名`protected_only` : 保護されたブランチのみを表示するかどうか`page` : ページ番号`perPage` : ページあたりの項目数	`repo`
`get-content`	ファイルまたはディレクトリの内容を取得する	`owner` : リポジトリの所有者`repo` : リポジトリ名`path` : ファイル/ディレクトリパス`ref` : ブランチ/コミット（オプション）	`repo`
`list-pull-requests`	リポジトリ内のプルリクエストを一覧表示する	`owner` : リポジトリの所有者`repo` : リポジトリ名`state` : PRの状態 filter `sort` : 並べ替えの基準`direction` : 並べ替えの方向`page` : ページ番号`per_page` : ページあたりの項目数	`repo`
`get-pull-request`	プルリクエストの詳細を取得する	`owner` : リポジトリのオーナー`repo` : リポジトリ名`pull_number` : プルリクエスト番号	`repo`
`create-pull-request`	新しいプルリクエストを作成する	`owner` : リポジトリの所有者`repo` : リポジトリ名`title` : PR のタイトル`head` : ヘッドブランチ`base` : ベースブランチ`body` : PR の説明`draft` : ドラフト PR として作成	`repo`
`merge-pull-request`	プルリクエストをマージする	`owner` : リポジトリのオーナー`repo` : リポジトリ名`pull_number` : プルリクエスト番号`merge_method` : マージ方法`commit_title` : コミットタイトル`commit_message` : コミットメッセージ	`repo`
`list-issues`	リポジトリ内の問題を一覧表示する	`owner` : リポジトリの所有者`repo` : リポジトリ名`state` : 問題の状態 filter `sort` : 並べ替えの基準`direction` : 並べ替えの方向`page` : ページ番号`per_page` : ページあたりの項目数	`repo`
`get-issue`	問題の詳細を取得する	`owner` : リポジトリの所有者`repo` : リポジトリ名`issue_number` : 問題番号	`repo`
`list-issue-comments`	問題またはプルリクエストのコメントを一覧表示する	`owner` : リポジトリの所有者`repo` : リポジトリ名`issue_number` : Issue/PR番号`page` : ページ番号`per_page` : ページあたりの項目数	`repo`
`create-issue`	新しい問題を作成する	`owner` : リポジトリの所有者`repo` : リポジトリ名`title` : 課題のタイトル`body` : 課題の本文`labels` : ラベル名の配列`assignees` : ユーザーログインの配列`milestone` : マイルストーンID	`repo`
`create-repository`	新しいリポジトリを作成する	`name` : リポジトリ名`description` : リポジトリの説明`private` : プライベートかどうか`auto_init` : README で初期化`gitignore_template` : .gitignore を追加`license_template` : ライセンスを追加`org` : 組織名	`repo`
`update-repository`	リポジトリ設定を更新する	`owner` : リポジトリの所有者`repo` : リポジトリ名`description` : 新しい説明`private` : プライバシーの変更`default_branch` : デフォルトブランチの変更`has_issues` : 課題の有効化/無効化`has_projects` : プロジェクトの有効化/無効化`has_wiki` : wiki の有効化/無効化`archived` : アーカイブ/アーカイブ解除	`repo`
`delete-repository`	リポジトリを削除する	`owner` : リポジトリの所有者`repo` : リポジトリ名`confirm` : 確認（trueである必要があります）	`delete_repo`
`list-workflows`	GitHub Actionsワークフローの一覧	`owner` : リポジトリの所有者`repo` : リポジトリ名`page` : ページ番号`perPage` : ページあたりの項目数	`actions:read`
`list-workflow-runs`	ワークフロー実行の一覧	`owner` : リポジトリの所有者`repo` : リポジトリ名`workflow_id` : ワークフローID/ファイル名`branch` : ブランチでフィルタリング`status` : ステータスでフィルタリング`page` : ページ番号`perPage` : ページあたりの項目数	`actions:read`
`trigger-workflow`	ワークフローをトリガーする	`owner` : リポジトリの所有者`repo` : リポジトリ名`workflow_id` : ワークフローID/ファイル名`ref` : Git参照`inputs` : ワークフローの入力	`actions:write`
`get-license-info`	GitHub Enterprise ライセンス情報を取得する	-	site_admin（管理者）アカウントが必要です
`get-enterprise-stats`	GitHub Enterprise のシステム統計を取得する	-	site_admin（管理者）アカウントが必要です

注：エンタープライズ固有のツール（ get-license-infoおよびget-enterprise-stats ）を使用するには、サイト管理者権限を持つユーザーが必要です。Fine-grained トークンではこれらのエンタープライズレベルの権限をサポートできない可能性があるため、Classic Personal Access Token の使用を推奨します。

カーソルのツールの使用

MCPサーバーをセットアップし、CursorをMCPサーバーに接続するように設定したら、CursorのAIチャットでGitHub Enterpriseツールを直接使用できるようになります。以下に例をいくつか示します。

リポジトリの一覧表示

mcp_github_enterprise_list_repositories(owner="octocat")

リポジトリ情報の取得

mcp_github_enterprise_get_repository(owner="octocat", repo="hello-world")

プルリクエストの一覧表示

mcp_github_enterprise_list_pull_requests(owner="octocat", repo="hello-world", state="open")

問題の管理

# List issues
mcp_github_enterprise_list_issues(owner="octocat", repo="hello-world", state="all")
# Get issue details
mcp_github_enterprise_get_issue(owner="octocat", repo="hello-world", issue_number=1)

# Get issue/PR comments
mcp_github_enterprise_list_issue_comments(owner="octocat", repo="hello-world", issue_number=1)


# Create a new issue
mcp_github_enterprise_create_issue(
  owner="octocat", 
  repo="hello-world",
  title="Found a bug",
  body="Here is a description of the bug",
  labels=["bug", "important"]
)

リポジトリコンテンツの操作

mcp_github_enterprise_get_content(owner="octocat", repo="hello-world", path="README.md")

リポジトリ管理

# Create a new repository
mcp_github_enterprise_create_repository(
  name="new-project",
  description="This is a new project",
  private=true,
  auto_init=true
)

# Update repository settings
mcp_github_enterprise_update_repository(
  owner="octocat",
  repo="hello-world",
  description="Updated description",
  has_issues=true
)

ユーザー管理（エンタープライズのみ）

これらの機能は、GitHub Enterprise Server 環境向けに特別に設計されており、管理者権限が必要です。

# List all users in the GitHub Enterprise instance
mcp_github_enterprise_list_users(filter="active", per_page=100)

# Get a specific user's details
mcp_github_enterprise_get_user(username="octocat")

# Create a new user (Enterprise only)
mcp_github_enterprise_create_user(
  login="newuser",
  email="newuser@example.com",
  name="New User",
  company="ACME Inc."
)

# Update a user's information (Enterprise only)
mcp_github_enterprise_update_user(
  username="octocat",
  email="updated-email@example.com",
  location="San Francisco"
)

# Suspend a user (Enterprise only)
mcp_github_enterprise_suspend_user(
  username="octocat",
  reason="Violation of terms of service"
)

# Unsuspend a user (Enterprise only)
mcp_github_enterprise_unsuspend_user(username="octocat")

# List organizations a user belongs to
mcp_github_enterprise_list_user_orgs(username="octocat")

APIの改善

柔軟な API URL 構成 (さまざまな環境変数とコマンドライン引数をサポート)
強化されたエラー処理とタイムアウト管理
ユーザーフレンドリーな応答フォーマットとメッセージ

貢献

貢献を歓迎します！お気軽にプルリクエストを送信してください。

ライセンス

ISC

Available Tools

28 tools

create-issueD

ParametersJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description
`body`	No	Issue content
`repo`	Yes	Repository name
`owner`	Yes	Repository owner (user or organization)
`title`	Yes	Issue title
`labels`	No	Label list
`assignees`	No	Assignee list
`milestone`	No	Milestone ID

TDQS

D1/5.0

Behavior1/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Tool has no description.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness1/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Tool has no description.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness1/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Tool has no description.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters1/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Tool has no description.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose1/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Tool has no description.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines1/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Tool has no description.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

create-pull-requestD

ParametersJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description
`owner`	Yes	Repository owner (user or organization)
`repo`	Yes	Repository name
`title`	Yes	Pull request title
`head`	Yes	Head branch (e.g., 'username:feature' or just 'feature' for same repo)
`base`	Yes	Base branch (e.g., 'main')
`body`	No	Pull request description
`draft`	No	Create as draft PR

TDQS

D1/5.0

Behavior1/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Tool has no description.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness1/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Tool has no description.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness1/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Tool has no description.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters1/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Tool has no description.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose1/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Tool has no description.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines1/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Tool has no description.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

create-repositoryD

ParametersJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description
`name`	Yes	Repository name
`description`	No	Repository description
`private`	No	Whether the repository is private
`auto_init`	No	Initialize with README
`gitignore_template`	No	Add .gitignore template
`license_template`	No	Add a license template
`org`	No	Organization name (if creating in an organization)

TDQS

D1/5.0

Behavior1/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Tool has no description.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness1/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Tool has no description.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness1/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Tool has no description.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters1/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Tool has no description.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose1/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Tool has no description.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines1/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Tool has no description.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

create-userD

ParametersJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description
`bio`	No	Biography for the user
`blog`	No	URL of the user's blog or website
`name`	No	Full name for the user
`email`	Yes	The email address for the user
`login`	Yes	The username for the user
`company`	No	Company for the user
`location`	No	Location for the user
`twitter_username`	No	Twitter username for the user

TDQS

D1/5.0

Behavior1/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Tool has no description.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness1/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Tool has no description.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness1/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Tool has no description.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters1/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Tool has no description.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose1/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Tool has no description.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines1/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Tool has no description.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

delete-repositoryD

ParametersJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description
`owner`	Yes	Repository owner
`repo`	Yes	Repository name
`confirm`	Yes	Confirmation for deletion (must be true)

TDQS

D1/5.0

Behavior1/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Tool has no description.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness1/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Tool has no description.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness1/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Tool has no description.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters1/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Tool has no description.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose1/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Tool has no description.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines1/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Tool has no description.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

delete-userD

ParametersJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
`username`	Yes	Username of the user to delete

TDQS

D1/5.0

Behavior1/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Tool has no description.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness1/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Tool has no description.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness1/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Tool has no description.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters1/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Tool has no description.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose1/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Tool has no description.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines1/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Tool has no description.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

get-contentD

ParametersJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description
`owner`	Yes	User or organization name
`repo`	Yes	Repository name
`path`	Yes	File or directory path
`ref`	No	Branch or commit hash (default: default branch)

TDQS

D1/5.0

Behavior1/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Tool has no description.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness1/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Tool has no description.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness1/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Tool has no description.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters1/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Tool has no description.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose1/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Tool has no description.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines1/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Tool has no description.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

get-enterprise-statsD

ParametersJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
No parameters

TDQS

D1/5.0

Behavior1/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Tool has no description.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness1/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Tool has no description.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness1/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Tool has no description.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters1/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Tool has no description.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose1/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Tool has no description.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines1/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Tool has no description.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

get-issueD

ParametersJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description
`owner`	Yes	Repository owner (user or organization)
`repo`	Yes	Repository name
`issue_number`	Yes	Issue number

TDQS

D1/5.0

Behavior1/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Tool has no description.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness1/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Tool has no description.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness1/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Tool has no description.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters1/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Tool has no description.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose1/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Tool has no description.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines1/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Tool has no description.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

get-license-infoD

ParametersJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
No parameters

TDQS

D1/5.0

Behavior1/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Tool has no description.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness1/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Tool has no description.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness1/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Tool has no description.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters1/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Tool has no description.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose1/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Tool has no description.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines1/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Tool has no description.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

get-pull-requestD

ParametersJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description
`owner`	Yes	Repository owner (user or organization)
`repo`	Yes	Repository name
`pull_number`	Yes	Pull request number

TDQS

D1/5.0

Behavior1/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Tool has no description.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness1/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Tool has no description.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness1/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Tool has no description.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters1/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Tool has no description.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose1/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Tool has no description.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines1/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Tool has no description.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

get-repositoryD

ParametersJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
`owner`	Yes	User or organization name
`repo`	Yes	Repository name

TDQS

D1/5.0

Behavior1/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Tool has no description.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness1/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Tool has no description.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness1/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Tool has no description.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters1/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Tool has no description.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose1/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Tool has no description.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines1/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Tool has no description.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

get-userD

ParametersJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
`username`	Yes	Username of the user to retrieve

TDQS

D1/5.0

Behavior1/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Tool has no description.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness1/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Tool has no description.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness1/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Tool has no description.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters1/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Tool has no description.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose1/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Tool has no description.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines1/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Tool has no description.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

list-branchesD

ParametersJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description
`owner`	Yes	User or organization name
`repo`	Yes	Repository name
`protected_only`	No	Whether to show only protected branches
`page`	No	Page number
`perPage`	No	Items per page

TDQS

D1/5.0

Behavior1/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Tool has no description.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness1/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Tool has no description.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness1/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Tool has no description.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters1/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Tool has no description.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose1/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Tool has no description.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines1/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Tool has no description.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

list-issue-commentsD

ParametersJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description
`page`	No	Page number
`repo`	Yes	Repository name
`owner`	Yes	Repository owner (user or organization)
`per_page`	No	Items per page
`issue_number`	Yes	Issue number

TDQS

D1/5.0

Behavior1/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Tool has no description.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness1/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Tool has no description.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness1/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Tool has no description.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters1/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Tool has no description.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose1/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Tool has no description.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines1/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Tool has no description.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

list-issuesD

ParametersJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
`owner`	Yes	Repository owner (user or organization)
`repo`	Yes	Repository name
`state`	No	Issue state filter	open
`sort`	No	Sort criteria	created
`direction`	No	Sort direction	desc
`page`	No	Page number
`per_page`	No	Items per page

TDQS

D1/5.0

Behavior1/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Tool has no description.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness1/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Tool has no description.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness1/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Tool has no description.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters1/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Tool has no description.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose1/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Tool has no description.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines1/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Tool has no description.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

list-pull-requestsD

ParametersJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
`owner`	Yes	Repository owner (user or organization)
`repo`	Yes	Repository name
`state`	No	PR state filter	open
`sort`	No	Sort criteria	created
`direction`	No	Sort direction	desc
`page`	No	Page number
`per_page`	No	Items per page

TDQS

D1/5.0

Behavior1/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Tool has no description.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness1/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Tool has no description.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness1/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Tool has no description.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters1/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Tool has no description.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose1/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Tool has no description.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines1/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Tool has no description.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

list-repositoriesD

ParametersJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
`owner`	Yes	User or organization name
`isOrg`	No	Whether it's an organization (true: organization, false: user)
`type`	No	Repository type filter	all
`sort`	No	Sort criteria	full_name
`page`	No	Page number
`perPage`	No	Items per page

TDQS

D1/5.0

Behavior1/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Tool has no description.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness1/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Tool has no description.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness1/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Tool has no description.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters1/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Tool has no description.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose1/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Tool has no description.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines1/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Tool has no description.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

list-user-orgsD

ParametersJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description
`page`	No	Page number for pagination
`per_page`	No	Number of results per page (max 100)
`username`	Yes	Username of the user whose organizations to list

TDQS

D1/5.0

Behavior1/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Tool has no description.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness1/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Tool has no description.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness1/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Tool has no description.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters1/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Tool has no description.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose1/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Tool has no description.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines1/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Tool has no description.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

list-usersD

ParametersJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description
`page`	No	Page number for pagination
`filter`	No	Filter users by status
`search`	No	Search query to filter users by username or email
`per_page`	No	Number of results per page (max 100)

TDQS

D1/5.0

Behavior1/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Tool has no description.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness1/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Tool has no description.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness1/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Tool has no description.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters1/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Tool has no description.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose1/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Tool has no description.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines1/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Tool has no description.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

list-workflow-runsD

ParametersJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description
`owner`	Yes	Repository owner
`repo`	Yes	Repository name
`workflow_id`	No	Workflow ID or file name
`branch`	No	Filter by branch name
`status`	No	Filter by run status
`page`	No	Page number
`perPage`	No	Items per page

TDQS

D1/5.0

Behavior1/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Tool has no description.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness1/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Tool has no description.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness1/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Tool has no description.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters1/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Tool has no description.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose1/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Tool has no description.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines1/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Tool has no description.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

list-workflowsD

ParametersJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description
`owner`	Yes	Repository owner
`repo`	Yes	Repository name
`page`	No	Page number
`perPage`	No	Items per page

TDQS

D1/5.0

Behavior1/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Tool has no description.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness1/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Tool has no description.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness1/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Tool has no description.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters1/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Tool has no description.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose1/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Tool has no description.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines1/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Tool has no description.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

merge-pull-requestD

ParametersJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
`owner`	Yes	Repository owner (user or organization)
`repo`	Yes	Repository name
`pull_number`	Yes	Pull request number
`commit_title`	No	Title for the automatic commit message
`commit_message`	No	Extra detail to append to automatic commit message
`merge_method`	No	Merge method to use	merge

TDQS

D1/5.0

Behavior1/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Tool has no description.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness1/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Tool has no description.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness1/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Tool has no description.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters1/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Tool has no description.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose1/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Tool has no description.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines1/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Tool has no description.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

suspend-userD

ParametersJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
`reason`	No	Reason for the suspension
`username`	Yes	Username of the user to suspend

TDQS

D1/5.0

Behavior1/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Tool has no description.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness1/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Tool has no description.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness1/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Tool has no description.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters1/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Tool has no description.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose1/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Tool has no description.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines1/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Tool has no description.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

trigger-workflowD

ParametersJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description
`owner`	Yes	Repository owner
`repo`	Yes	Repository name
`workflow_id`	Yes	Workflow ID or file name
`ref`	Yes	Git reference (branch, tag, SHA)
`inputs`	No	Workflow inputs

TDQS

D1/5.0

Behavior1/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Tool has no description.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness1/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Tool has no description.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness1/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Tool has no description.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters1/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Tool has no description.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose1/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Tool has no description.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines1/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Tool has no description.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

unsuspend-userD

ParametersJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
`username`	Yes	Username of the user to unsuspend

TDQS

D1/5.0

Behavior1/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Tool has no description.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness1/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Tool has no description.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness1/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Tool has no description.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters1/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Tool has no description.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose1/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Tool has no description.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines1/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Tool has no description.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

update-repositoryD

ParametersJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description
`owner`	Yes	Repository owner
`repo`	Yes	Repository name
`description`	No	New description
`private`	No	Change privacy setting
`default_branch`	No	Change default branch
`has_issues`	No	Enable/disable issues
`has_projects`	No	Enable/disable projects
`has_wiki`	No	Enable/disable wiki
`archived`	No	Archive/unarchive repository

TDQS

D1/5.0

Behavior1/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Tool has no description.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness1/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Tool has no description.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness1/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Tool has no description.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters1/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Tool has no description.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose1/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Tool has no description.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines1/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Tool has no description.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

update-userD

ParametersJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description
`bio`	No	Biography for the user
`blog`	No	URL of the user's blog or website
`name`	No	Full name for the user
`email`	No	The email address for the user
`company`	No	Company for the user
`location`	No	Location for the user
`username`	Yes	Username of the user to update
`twitter_username`	No	Twitter username for the user

TDQS

D1/5.0

Behavior1/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Tool has no description.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness1/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Tool has no description.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness1/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Tool has no description.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters1/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Tool has no description.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose1/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Tool has no description.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines1/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Tool has no description.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Tool Schema Changelog

Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

2 tool updatesv1.0.0Jan 2, 2026
- Changedget-enterprise-stats1 field changed
  - removedInput schema / additionalProperties
```
Removed value: -false
```
- Changedget-license-info1 field changed
  - removedInput schema / additionalProperties
```
Removed value: -false
```
28 tool updatesAug 18, 2025
- First observedcreate-issue
- First observedcreate-pull-request
- First observedcreate-repository
- First observedcreate-user
- First observeddelete-repository
- First observeddelete-user
- First observedget-content
- First observedget-enterprise-stats
- First observedget-issue
- First observedget-license-info
- First observedget-pull-request
- First observedget-repository
- First observedget-user
- First observedlist-branches
- First observedlist-issue-comments
- First observedlist-issues
- First observedlist-pull-requests
- First observedlist-repositories
- First observedlist-user-orgs
- First observedlist-users
- First observedlist-workflow-runs
- First observedlist-workflows
- First observedmerge-pull-request
- First observedsuspend-user
- First observedtrigger-workflow
- First observedunsuspend-user
- First observedupdate-repository
- First observedupdate-user

Deploy Server

Shareable, User-Owned Context BackendPeople, applications, and agents read, write, and coordinate together in one context lake. Reach it over MCP, a CLI, a Python SDK, or REST.fulcradynamics.comAd

TDQS

C2/5.0

Scored 2026-09-10 02:38 across 28 tools

Disambiguation5/5

Each tool targets a distinct resource-action combination, such as list-repositories vs get-repository vs create-repository. Even within the same resource, tools like get-issue, create-issue, and list-issues are clearly separated. No two tools appear to do the same thing.

Naming Consistency5/5

All tool names follow a consistent kebab-case verb-noun pattern (e.g., list-issues, create-repository, suspend-user). The verbs are uniform and predictable, making the naming convention highly consistent across the entire set.

Tool Count4/5

With 28 tools, the count is on the heavier side, but it covers a broad enterprise domain including repositories, issues, pull requests, workflows, users, and enterprise stats. Each tool seems justified for the scope, so the count is appropriate, though slightly above the typical well-scoped range.

Completeness3/5

The tool surface covers core CRUD for repositories and users, plus workflows and pull requests, but has notable gaps: no update-issue or delete-issue, no update/delete for pull requests, and no search capabilities. These missing operations will require agents to work around limitations in common workflows.

Maintenance

ActivityInactive

ResponsivenessNo issues

Resources

Need Help?

Reddit Discussion

Related Servers

Related MCP Connectors

ArletOAuth
dev.arlet
Create, deploy, and operate MCP servers directly from your GitHub repositories.
Developer Tools CI/CD & DevOps
2
gread A
io.github.NitroRCr
An MCP server that gives your AI access to the source code and docs of all public github repos
Version Control Code Analysis Documentation Access
5365
neverinfamous-memory-journal-mcp
ai.smithery
A MCP server built for developers enabling Git based project management with project and personal…
Version Control Developer Tools Project Management
320
mcp-openaiOAuth
io.github.AceDataCloud
MCP server for OpenAI API (chat completions, image generation, embeddings) via AceDataCloud
AI & Machine Learning Image & Video Processing
11

Related MCP Servers

GitHub MCP Serverofficial
Version Control Developer Tools File Systems
modelcontextprotocol
-
license
Not graded
quality
A
maintenance
MCP Server for the GitHub API, enabling file operations, repository management, search functionality, and more.
Updated a day ago (2026-10-12 05:33 UTC)
137,300 npm
91,120
MIT
GitHub CLI MCP Server
Version Control Developer Tools CI/CD & DevOps
munch-group
A
license
Not graded
quality
D
maintenance
An MCP server that wraps the GitHub CLI to provide comprehensive access to repository management, pull requests, issues, and workflows. It enables users to perform complex GitHub operations and interact with the GitHub API through a standardized interface.
Updated 10 months ago (2025-12-09 18:17 UTC)
355 npm
1
ISC
mcp-github-server
Version Control Project Management
pblarismendi
A
license
B
quality
D
maintenance
An MCP server that enables managing GitHub repositories, pull requests, issues, and more through natural language in Cursor or Claude Desktop.
Updated 9 months ago (2025-12-29 16:27 UTC)
39
3 npm
4
MIT
@cloud9-labs/mcp-github
Version Control Developer Tools
cloud9-labs
A
license
B
quality
D
maintenance
MCP (Model Context Protocol) server for GitHub API integration. This server provides comprehensive tools for interacting with GitHub repositories, issues, pull requests, branches, and code search through a unified interface.
Updated 8 months ago (2026-02-12 04:44 UTC)
15
8 npm
MIT

GitHub Enterprise MCP サーバー

互換性

主な特徴

はじめる

前提条件

Dockerのインストールとセットアップ

オプション1: Dockerで実行する

オプション2: Docker Composeを使用する

インストールとセットアップ

ローカル開発（並行モードの使用）

生産のためのインストールとセットアップ

オプション 1: URL モードの使用 (ローカル開発に推奨)

オプション2: グローバルコマンドとしてインストールする (npm リンク)

オプション3: npx を使用する (パッケージが公開されている場合)

AIツールとの統合

クロードデスクトップ

カーソル

推奨: URL モード (最も安定)

代替手段: コマンドモード

言語設定

環境変数

コマンドライン引数

HTTPモードの追加オプション

利用可能なMCPツール

カーソルのツールの使用

リポジトリの一覧表示

リポジトリ情報の取得

プルリクエストの一覧表示

問題の管理

リポジトリコンテンツの操作

リポジトリ管理

ユーザー管理（エンタープライズのみ）

APIの改善

貢献

ライセンス

Available Tools

Tool Schema Changelog

Maintenance

Resources

Related MCP Connectors

Related MCP Servers

GitHub MCP Serverofficial

Appeared in Searches