kenpom-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to kenpom-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceA Python MCP server providing 11 tools for querying KenPom basketball analytics, including efficiency ratings, game predictions, four factors, and more through Claude.15-
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables MCP-compatible LLM clients to access live NBA data, including stats, standings, rosters, scores, and box scores via callable tools.9MIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceProvides comprehensive NBA statistics via Model Context Protocol, enabling queries for player stats, game scores, team info, and advanced analytics through natural language.2110MIT
- AlicenseAqualityFmaintenanceProvides AI agents with direct access to KingsPlaybook's sports data including confirmed lineups, player projections, game lines, and pick history via native MCP tools.518 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceExposes the StatsPlus API as tools for MCP-compatible clients, enabling users to query player/team statistics, contracts, ratings, and game history via natural language.155MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server for accessing college basketball statistics through the SportsData.io CBB v3 Stats API, enabling AI agents to retrieve and analyze college basketball data through natural language interactions.-
TDQS
Scored across 18 tools
Most tools target a distinct resource (ratings, efficiency, four factors, player stats, arenas, schedule, etc.). However, several team-level stat tools (get_ratings, get_efficiency, get_four_factors, get_team_stats, get_scouting_report) overlap in content, though descriptions clarify their specific focuses.
All tool names follow a consistent 'get_<noun>' pattern in snake_case, making them highly predictable. Examples include get_ratings, get_schedule, get_scouting_report, and get_conference_standings.
With 18 tools, the server is comprehensive but slightly heavy for a niche stats domain. The count is justifiable given the breadth of KenPom data, but it edges into the upper range of ideal scope.
The surface covers a wide range of college basketball analytics: ratings, efficiency, player stats, schedule, conference stats, and more. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no direct box score or team roster details beyond height), but core use cases are well covered.