reboot
Automatically logs into OpenWrt and reboots the system.
Instructions
Reboot OpenWRT. 會自動先登入取得Token再執行重開機。
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Output Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| result | Yes |
Automatically logs into OpenWrt and reboots the system.
Reboot OpenWRT. 會自動先登入取得Token再執行重開機。
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| result | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided. The description reveals that the tool automatically logs in to obtain a token before rebooting, which is a valuable behavioral detail beyond a simple reboot.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Two sentences, one in English and one in Chinese, provide the essential information. Could be slightly more concise by merging, but it is well-structured and front-loaded.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple reboot tool, the description communicates the core action and the automatic login behavior. However, it lacks details on the reboot's impact (e.g., immediate, duration, caution) that an agent might need.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
There are no parameters, and the input schema coverage is 100% (trivially). According to guidelines, 0 parameters yields a baseline of 4, and no additional parameter description is needed.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states 'Reboot OpenWRT', which is a specific verb-resource pairing. It is distinct from sibling tools (network_status, read_log, set_led_state, system_status) that deal with monitoring or configuration.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description implies usage when a reboot is needed, and mentions automatic login, but does not provide explicit when-not-to-use scenarios or alternatives.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/dbshadow/openwrt-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server