Skip to main content
Glama
davinoishi

Broken Link Checker MCP Server

by davinoishi

Server Configuration

Describes the environment variables required to run the server.

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Instructions

Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.

This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.

Capabilities

Server capabilities have not been inspected yet.

Tools

Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions

NameDescription
check_page_linksA

Check all links on a single HTML page for broken links. Returns detailed information about each link found including broken status, HTTP status codes, and reasons for failure.

check_siteA

Recursively crawl and check all links across an entire website. This will scan multiple pages and check all internal and external links found. Use with caution on large sites as it may take significant time.

Prompts

Interactive templates invoked by user choice

NameDescription

No prompts

Resources

Contextual data attached and managed by the client

NameDescription

No resources

TDQS

A3.9/5.0

Scored across 2 tools

Disambiguation5/5

The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: check_page_links targets a single HTML page, while check_site handles an entire website with recursive crawling. There is no overlap in scope or functionality, making it easy for an agent to choose the appropriate tool based on the task.

Naming Consistency5/5

Both tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (check_page_links and check_site), using the same verb 'check' and descriptive nouns that clearly indicate their targets. The naming is predictable and readable throughout.

Tool Count2/5

With only two tools, the server feels thin for a broken link checker domain. While the tools cover single-page and site-wide checks, there are likely missing operations such as checking specific links, managing crawl settings, or handling reports, which could limit agent workflows.

Completeness3/5

The tools provide basic coverage for checking links on a page or site, but there are notable gaps. For example, there is no tool to check individual links, configure crawl parameters, or retrieve historical results, which might be expected in a more complete link-checking surface.

Maintenance

ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues