Broken Link Checker MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to Broken Link Checker MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables scanning web pages and entire domains to identify broken links, checking hyperlinks, images, scripts, and other resources. Provides comprehensive link validation with robots.txt compliance and detailed reporting of link status across single pages or complete websites.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents to validate HTTP(S) links referenced in Markdown files and directories through the Model Context Protocol, detecting broken links and returning structured JSON results. Supports configurable concurrency, timeouts, and ignored domains.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceAnalyzes websites for broken links, missing meta tags, and redirect chains. Returns a structured report with a health score and fix suggestions.127 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceAnalyzes websites for broken links, missing meta tags, and redirect chains, returning a health score and actionable suggestions.128 npm1MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables SEO auditing and site analysis by crawling websites, identifying issues, and generating reports like sitemaps and markdown exports.55 npm4MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenanceAn MCP server that lets AI assistants check single URLs, scan HTML content, and crawl entire websites for broken links via four tools.-
TDQS
Scored across 2 tools
The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: check_page_links targets a single HTML page, while check_site handles an entire website with recursive crawling. There is no overlap in scope or functionality, making it easy for an agent to choose the appropriate tool based on the task.
Both tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (check_page_links and check_site), using the same verb 'check' and descriptive nouns that clearly indicate their targets. The naming is predictable and readable throughout.
With only two tools, the server feels thin for a broken link checker domain. While the tools cover single-page and site-wide checks, there are likely missing operations such as checking specific links, managing crawl settings, or handling reports, which could limit agent workflows.
The tools provide basic coverage for checking links on a page or site, but there are notable gaps. For example, there is no tool to check individual links, configure crawl parameters, or retrieve historical results, which might be expected in a more complete link-checking surface.