Dismiss Eight Sleep Alarm

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already mark the tool as destructive (destructiveHint=true) and a mutation (readOnlyHint=false). The description adds the context that it only works on an 'actively ringing alarm', which is valuable. No contradictions.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, each essential. The action is front-loaded, and the constraint is clear. No wasted words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a destructive mutation tool with three parameters and low schema coverage, the description is minimal. It assumes prior knowledge of alarm_ids and does not explain what happens after dismissal (e.g., permanent vs temporary). The presence of an output schema mitigates this slightly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is only 33% (only alarm_id described). The tool description does not add meaning to the other parameters (user_id, response_format), missing an opportunity to clarify their purpose.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Dismiss an actively ringing alarm' uses a specific verb ('Dismiss') and resource ('actively ringing alarm'), clearly distinguishing it from the sibling tool 'eight_sleep_snooze_alarm'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description states the prerequisite 'Requires EIGHT_SLEEP_ALLOW_MUTATIONS=true', providing an important usage condition. However, it does not explicitly contrast with alternatives like snooze.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.