unuse_notebook

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The annotation indicates destructiveHint=true, so the tool has destructive behavior. The description adds 'release its resources,' but does not detail what resources (e.g., kernel, memory) are affected or whether the action is reversible. More context is needed to fully inform the agent.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence with no unnecessary words. However, the phrasing 'Unuse from a specific notebook' is slightly awkward; 'Disconnect from a notebook' would be clearer. Still concise and front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple destructive tool with one parameter, the description is somewhat complete. However, it does not mention the return value or side effects beyond releasing resources. With an output schema present, return values are covered there, but more behavioral context would improve completeness.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100% (the parameter has a description 'Notebook identifier to disconnect'), so the description does not need to add more. It simply restates that it's for a specific notebook, adding no extra meaning beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's purpose: 'unuse' from a notebook and release its resources. It distinguishes from sibling tools like connect_to_jupyter or restart_notebook by focusing on disconnecting and cleanup.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. The description does not specify prerequisites, such as needing to be currently using the notebook, or when not to use it (e.g., if the notebook is needed later).

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.