datagokr
Related Servers
Alternatives to datagokr
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceMCP server enabling natural language search and recommendation of Seoul Open Data Plaza datasets, covering APIs and non-API formats with provider and recency filters.5-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA read-only MCP server providing access to various Korean public data such as subway arrivals, weather, fine dust, bike availability, real estate, and more.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceKorean public-data MCP servers for AI agents, enabling natural language queries to KOSIS statistics and other Korean official data sources without requiring local accounts or API keys.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceBridges Korean public data APIs (data.go.kr) into MCP with automatic OpenAPI normalization, quota management, caching, and backoff. Enables natural language interaction with Korean government data through MCP.71 PyPIApache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for Korean public institution information, enabling AI clients to search, compare, and analyze disclosure data, public services, laws, and news.321MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceAn MCP server that provides access to Seoul's real-time city data (population, transit, air quality, weather, cultural events, etc.) and batch statistics, enabling natural language queries about Seoul. It also includes a catalog of raw Seoul Open Data Plaza datasets.191MIT
TDQS
Scored across 10 tools
Most tools have distinct roles: search vs fields, login vs login_status, apply vs download. However, preview, get, and fetch all retrieve row/access information and could be confused despite clarifying notes about credentials and saving.
All names are lowercase snake_case, but the pattern is mixed: several bare verbs (get, fetch, apply) alongside nouns (fields, login_status) with no consistent verb_noun convention. Still readable, but not predictable.
10 tools is well within the ideal range for this server's purpose. Each tool covers a distinct phase of the public-data workflow (auth, discovery, inspection, retrieval, application) and none feels redundant.
The surface covers login, discovery, metadata inspection, preview, access application, API/file retrieval, and download, forming a complete workflow. A minor gap remains: there is no explicit tool for listing or tracking submitted applications beyond the apply return value.