Skip to main content
Glama
databutton

Databutton MCP Server

Official
by databutton

Related Servers

Alternatives to Databutton MCP Server

Related Servers

  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    An MCP server that launches a lightweight localhost UI for interactive AI-assisted brainstorming and planning. It enables collaborative ideation workflows with visual diagrams, interactive elements, and image support for seamless human-AI collaboration.
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    MCP server that lets Claude, ChatGPT, or VS Code build a complete, machine-checked model of your domain and generate an app from it.
    Apache 2.0
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    A remote MCP server that lets a coding agent turn a plain-language idea into a real, shareable product — creating the project and data model, serving live API endpoints, deploying custom endpoints and server-side functions, and reading request and function logs. It handles sign-up, OAuth-backed access, and OpenAPI spec generation so people can open, sign into, and use the app the agent builds.
    MIT
  • F
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    A basic MCP server template that provides a foundation for building custom tools, resources, and prompts. Serves as a starting point for developers to create their own MCP server functionality.
    -

TDQS

C2.2/5.0

Scored across 1 tool

Disambiguation5/5

With only one tool, there is no possibility of ambiguity or overlap between tools. The tool has a single, clear purpose that cannot be confused with any other tool in the set.

Naming Consistency5/5

Since there is only one tool, naming consistency is inherently perfect. The tool name 'submit_app_requirements' follows a clear verb_noun pattern, and there are no other tools to deviate from this pattern.

Tool Count2/5

A single tool is too few for a server named 'Databutton MCP Server', which suggests a broader scope for app development or management. One tool cannot cover the expected domain comprehensively, making it feel thin and under-scoped.

Completeness2/5

The tool set is severely incomplete for the implied domain of app development or requirements management. With only a submission tool, there are obvious gaps such as retrieving, updating, or deleting requirements, and no coverage of other app-related operations like deployment or testing.

Maintenance

ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues