F
licenseNot graded
qualityD
maintenanceMCP server that lets Claude Code offload simple tasks like code explanation, writing tests, and adding comments to a local Ollama model, saving Claude API tokens.
-
ollama-code-mcp
by darthzen
Related Servers
Alternatives to ollama-code-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceA small MCP server that turns a shared Ollama box into a team resource for Claude Code, providing typed tools and delegated read-only repo exploration using local models.MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server that lets Claude Code dispatch tasks to the LiteLLM gateway, supporting both local Ollama models and Anthropic models via the gateway.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server that provides agentic code review powered by OpenAI-compatible models, designed for use with Claude Code.1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server that lets Claude Code delegate mechanical tasks to a local LLM for summarization, classification, extraction, and drafting.7 npm11MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server that lets ChatGPT or any MCP client securely delegate coding tasks to a local Claude Code instance, with git checkpointing, approval gates, and structured results. Supports code review, test running, and rollback via simple tool calls.8 npmMIT
TDQS
A4.2/5.0
Scored across 9 tools
Disambiguation5/5
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: code generation, explanation, review, debugging, refactoring (single and batch), test writing, diff review, and status check. No two tools overlap in functionality.
Naming Consistency5/5
All tools follow a consistent verb_noun snake_case pattern (e.g., explain_code, fix_code, batch_refactor). No mixed conventions or vague names.
Tool Count5/5
9 tools is a well-scoped set for a code assistance server. It covers the essential operations without being overwhelming or too sparse.
Completeness4/5
The set covers generation, explanation, review, debugging, refactoring, test writing, and status checking. Minor gaps like code documentation or execution are absent, but the core workflow is well-supported.
Maintenance
ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessNo issues