get_nugget
Retrieve a knowledge nugget by its unique ID. Access the nugget's content and metadata.
Instructions
Get a knowledge nugget by ID
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | Nugget ID |
Retrieve a knowledge nugget by its unique ID. Access the nugget's content and metadata.
Get a knowledge nugget by ID
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | Nugget ID |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, so description must cover behavioral traits. It only states 'get by ID' without mentioning return behavior (e.g., null if not found) or safety (read-only).
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, front-loaded, no unnecessary words. Efficient for a simple retrieval tool.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple get-by-ID tool with one parameter and no output schema, the description is minimally adequate but lacks detail on return format or error handling.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema covers 100% of parameters, so baseline is 3. Description adds 'by ID' but that is already implicit from parameter name. No additional semantic value.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states the action (Get), resource (knowledge nugget), and method (by ID). It differentiates from sibling tools like list_nuggets and other get_* tools.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Usage is implied: use when you have a nugget ID. No explicit guidance on when to avoid or alternatives, though siblings are available for listing.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/da-troll/troll-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server