MCP FishAudio Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to MCP FishAudio Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that integrates high-quality text-to-speech capabilities with Claude Desktop and other MCP-compatible clients, supporting multiple voice options and audio formats.6 npm1MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceAn MCP server that wraps the WellSaid Labs text-to-speech API, enabling Claude to generate lifelike voiceovers with voice selection, prosody control, and caption support directly from text.10MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server for FlowSpeech text-to-speech. It lets MCP-compatible clients generate human-like audio with context-aware emotion control, pause control, multi-speaker dialogue, and 30+ available voices.36 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that enables LLMs to generate spoken audio from text using OpenAI's Text-to-Speech API, supporting various voices, models, and audio formats.12 npm1MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that enables AI models to generate and play high-quality text-to-speech audio through your device's native audio system using Rime's voice synthesis API.112 npm27-
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceAn educational implementation of a Model Context Protocol server that demonstrates how to build a functional MCP server for integrating with various LLM clients like Claude Desktop.1164MIT
TDQS
Scored across 2 tools
The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: one lists voice references (a read-only operation), and the other generates speech (a synthesis operation). There is no overlap or ambiguity between these functions, making it easy for an agent to select the correct tool.
Both tools follow a consistent snake_case naming pattern with a 'fish_audio_' prefix, followed by a descriptive verb_noun combination (list_references and tts). This uniformity enhances readability and predictability across the tool set.
With only two tools, the server feels under-scoped for a TTS API domain. Key operations like managing references (e.g., create, update, delete) or configuring TTS parameters are missing, limiting the server's utility and forcing agents to work around gaps.
The tool set is severely incomplete for a TTS API. While it covers listing references and generating speech, it lacks essential CRUD operations for references (e.g., create, update, delete) and configuration tools (e.g., set parameters, list voices). This will likely cause agent failures in common workflows.