Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to KillerSkills

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Scans remote MCP endpoints, manifests, and agent skills for security threats, providing deterministic scores, verdicts, and signed reports to verify agent infrastructure before trust or payments.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Security scanning for AI agent skills, MCP servers, and agent prompts, returning signed trust scores and detailed findings.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A security gate MCP server that audits agent extensions (skills, MCP servers, tools) by scanning for risks, adversarial analysis, and sandbox execution, returning a trust verdict of allow, quarantine, or block.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A security scanner that evaluates installed MCP servers for vulnerabilities by aggregating findings from 16 scanning engines into detailed trust scores. It enables users to scan their local AI agent configurations or specific repository URLs for potential security risks.
      4
      21 PyPI
      2
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables agents and developers to check whether repositories, packages, MCP servers, and agent identities are safe to connect with by retrieving signed trust decisions, 0–100 scores, badges, and supporting findings through anonymous read-only tools.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A read-only MCP server that lets an agent audit its own environment by discovering local MCP configurations and skill folders on Windows, macOS, and Linux and running offline static checks for prompt injection, hidden instructions, hardcoded secrets, dangerous commands, unpinned packages, and excessive filesystem or transport permissions. It exposes tools to scan everything discovered, list configurations, vet a single skill, or analyze supplied text, returning text, JSON, SARIF, or HTML findings with CI-friendly severity levels.
      14 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    check_skill is an exact-name verdict lookup while search_skills is keyword discovery, so the boundary is clear. There is minor overlap because search results also return verdicts, which could make an agent unsure which to reach for first, but the descriptions disambiguate ('BEFORE installing' vs 'pick a verified option').

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both names follow a clean verb_noun snake_case pattern (check_skill, search_skills). The singular/plural difference reflects the actual semantics (one package vs many results), which is a reasonable and readable variation.

    Tool Count3/5

    Two tools is thin for a server surface, even one this narrowly scoped to security verdicts. Both tools clearly earn their place, but the minimal surface leaves little room for related operations.

    Completeness4/5

    The core lifecycle of 'discover a candidate skill' (search_skills) and 'verify it before install' (check_skill) is covered, including version/sandbox detail in the verdict response. Minor gaps exist around bulk checks or retrieving full findings/history, but agents can work around them.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessSyncing