pgs-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to pgs-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables querying the EMBL-EBI catalog of published polygenic scores through read-only tools that search scores, traits, publications, performance metrics, sample sets, cohorts, and releases, and that trace GWAS studies and resolve ontology and ancestry identifiers. It also lists and downloads the associated scoring-file and metadata files from the catalog's FTP site.241Apache 2.0

Bio-MCP FastQC Serverofficial
AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to perform quality control analysis on high-throughput sequencing data using FastQC and MultiQC. It supports single-file and batch processing of FASTQ/FASTA files and generates comprehensive, interactive summary reports.MIT- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables MCP hosts and agents to run structural and format checks on delivered artifacts and generate consolidated QC reports in JSON and Markdown, so issues can be surfaced and fixed before delivery.MIT
- FlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceEnables querying rare-variant, gene-based association results across ~1.2M individuals from 10 global biobanks, supporting phenome-wide scans, replication screens across ancestries, and candidate list evaluation for 44 harmonized traits.4-
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for polygenic risk score analysis, wrapping just-prs to enable catalog search, PRS computation, VCF normalization, percentile and risk estimation, and quality assessment.201MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables environmental scientists to tidy PFAS lab files, screen results against two drinking-water guideline sets side by side, search public guidance with page-level citations, and check report text so every number traces back to its lab row or guideline page.9Apache 2.0
TDQS
Scored across 2 tools
The two tools have mostly distinct roles: assess_match_qc computes metrics and warnings, while render_qc_report produces a Markdown report. A user might still briefly wonder whether to call assessment before rendering, but the descriptions make the boundary clear enough.
Both names use snake_case and begin with a verb, giving a predictable style. The internal ordering differs slightly between assess_match_qc and render_qc_report, but it is not confusing.
Two tools are quite thin for a server surface, even for a specialized QC workflow. The tools are well-scoped, but the server sits at the borderline of feeling under-provisioned.
The surface covers the core workflow of assessing match QC and rendering a report for single scores or whole runs. Minor gaps may exist around discovery or filtering, but the main lifecycle is represented.