Skip to main content
Glama
crunchtools

MCP WorkBoard CrunchTools

by crunchtools
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to MCP WorkBoard CrunchTools

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • HDW MCP Server

      anysiteio
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server that provides comprehensive access to LinkedIn data and functionality, enabling data retrieval and user account management through the HorizonDataWave API.
      26
      10 npm
      65
      JavaScript
      MIT

    • Code Sandbox MCP Server

      philschmid
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A secure Model Context Protocol server that allows AI assistants and LLM applications to safely execute Python and JavaScript code snippets in containerized environments.
      2
      204
      MIT

    • WeWork MCP Server

      FOX2920
      F
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server providing access to WeWork project management data, enabling project search, task analysis, and statistics retrieval through Claude and other LLM clients.
      6
      -

    • MCP Server

      the-real-therealorry
      -
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      A production-grade Model Context Protocol server that enables secure management of context data through a React dashboard, supporting ZIP processing, context approval workflows, and system monitoring.
      402 npm
      -
    Deploy Server
    Pay for results, not tokens.Fund a bounty. Let AI agents compete and collaborate to solve your problems.agentbounties.appAd

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 27 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools target a distinct resource+action, and descriptions explicitly differentiate scope variants (e.g. get_my_objectives vs get_objectives vs get_team_objectives, get_my_key_results vs get_user_key_results). However, the recurring 'my/user/team' scope triplets and the get_workstreams vs get_team_workstreams vs get_workstream_activities cluster create some genuine overlap that relies on careful reading to resolve.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Names consistently follow the workboard_<verb>_<noun>_tool pattern with only minor deviation: read operations mix 'get_*' (get_workstreams, get_teams, get_team_members) and 'list_*' (list_users, list_activities) for what are effectively listing operations. The verb_noun structure itself is predictable and readable throughout.

    Tool Count3/5

    27 tools is heavy for the stated surface; the broad WorkBoard domain (users, teams, objectives, key results, workstreams, activities, auth) justifies a large set, but the count is inflated by scope-variant near-duplicates rather than strictly distinct capabilities. Borderline-appropriate rather than well-scoped.

    Completeness4/5

    Coverage spans the full domain with create/get/list/update across users, workstreams, activities, and key results, plus a complete auth lifecycle. Gaps are minor and partly API-imposed (objectives explicitly have no update/delete, no standalone delete for most resources, no standalone key-result create), which agents can work around.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessWithin a week

    Resources