Skip to main content
Glama
mcp-pcloud-crunchtools

mcp-pcloud-crunchtools

by crunchtools

Pcloud Get User Info

pcloud_get_user_info
Read-only

Retrieve the authenticated pCloud account's profile and storage quota usage to monitor available space and account details.

Instructions

Get the authenticated pCloud account's profile and quota usage.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "pcloud_get_user_info"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
resultYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed2 schema fields changedv2.5.0
    • addedInput schema / additionalProperties
      Added value: +false
    • removedOutput schema / description
      Removed value: -"Generic wrapper for non-object return types."
  2. First observedv2.1.0

TDQS

A4/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds that it's for the authenticated account and includes quota usage, but doesn't mention return format, rate limits, or auth requirements beyond what's implied.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence, front-loaded with the verb and resource, zero waste.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a zero-param read-only tool with an output schema, the description is nearly complete—but it could briefly note that it requires authentication or what the profile includes to be fully self-contained.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Zero parameters, so schema coverage is trivially 100% and there's nothing to compensate for; baseline is 4 for no params.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb (Get) and resource (authenticated pCloud account's profile and quota usage), clearly distinguishing it from siblings like pcloud_get_file_info or pcloud_auth_status.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Usage is implied by the description—retrieve account profile and quota—but it doesn't explicitly say when to use this versus pcloud_auth_status or other informational tools, nor does it list exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.