Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
mcp-pcloud-crunchtools

mcp-pcloud-crunchtools

by crunchtools
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Remote

Pcloud Auth Result

pcloud_auth_result

Get the outcome of the most recent pCloud authorization redirect to verify if login succeeded or failed.

Instructions

Report the outcome of the most recent authorization redirect.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "pcloud_auth_result"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
resultYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Addedv2.5.0

TDQS

A3.7/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are present, so the description carries the full behavioral burden. It clearly frames the tool as a reporting/read operation and adds the stateful 'most recent' qualifier, but it does not disclose behavior if no redirect has occurred or whether the result is consumed by the call. Adequate but not deeply transparent.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

One clean sentence that front-loads the action and resource. No filler, repetition, or unnecessary detail.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no parameters and an output schema present, the short description is nearly sufficient for a zero-argument reporting tool. It could add more explicit usage context, but the simple tool shape makes it reasonably complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has zero properties, so there is no parameter documentation burden. The baseline of 4 applies because the description does not need to explain parameters that do not exist.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb ('Report') and a specific resource ('outcome of the most recent authorization redirect'). The 'redirect' wording helps distinguish it from sibling auth tools like pcloud_auth_start and pcloud_auth_status, though it does not explicitly contrast with auth_status.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies the tool is used after an authorization redirect but provides no explicit when-to-use guidance, prerequisites, or alternatives among the auth siblings. It is not misleading, but the agent must infer the intended call timing.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools