Skip to main content
Glama
crunchtools

mcp-ashigaru

by crunchtools

Server Configuration

Describes the environment variables required to run the server.

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Instructions

Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.

This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.

Capabilities

Features and capabilities supported by this server

Protocol revision2025-11-25

CapabilityDetails
tools
{
  "listChanged": true
}
logging
{}
prompts
{
  "listChanged": false
}
resources
{
  "subscribe": false,
  "listChanged": false
}
extensions
{
  "io.modelcontextprotocol/ui": {}
}
experimental
{}

Tools

Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions

NameDescription
work_ticketA

Start a dev run: clone , fix GitHub issue # with Claude (Sonnet), run the repo's quality gates, and open a PR. Returns a run_id immediately; the run continues in the background. Poll status(run_id) for progress.

statusA

Return an on-demand digest of a run: current phase, recent agent actions, gate result, and PR URL. This is what Kagetora answers from when you ask "what's the runner doing?".

promoteA

GATED. Promote a reviewed PR to production via the repo's deploy path.

Refuses unless approval_token matches the human-approval marker recorded for this PR (set only through a confirmed Signal approval). This is the hard gate on the one irreversible action — the coding agent never reaches it.

Prompts

Interactive templates invoked by user choice

NameDescription

No prompts

Resources

Contextual data attached and managed by the client

NameDescription

No resources

TDQS

A4/5.0

Scored across 3 tools

Disambiguation5/5

Each tool serves a unique purpose: starting a run, monitoring status, and promoting to production. There is no overlap in functionality.

Naming Consistency4/5

All names are simple and readable, but there is a slight inconsistency: 'promote' and 'status' are single words while 'work_ticket' is a compound. However, the style is uniform overall.

Tool Count3/5

With only 3 tools, the server feels minimal for a deployment pipeline. While it covers the essential steps, additional tools like cancellation or listing runs would be expected for broader utility.

Completeness3/5

The tool set covers the core workflow (start, check, promote), but lacks common operations such as canceling a run, retrying, or viewing history. The surface is functional but not comprehensive.

Maintenance

ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessResponsive