Skip to main content
Glama
crunchtools

mcp-ashigaru

by crunchtools
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to mcp-ashigaru

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • okffs

      neturely
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      An MCP server that lets Claude Code manage GitHub issues, branches, and pull requests through natural language, automating the full development workflow from planning to closing.
      523 npm
      2
      MIT

    • dev-loop-mcp

      soynog
      F
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that automates the full software development lifecycle through an AI-driven TDD state machine. It handles everything from task decomposition and test-driven development to integration testing and automated pull request creation.
      4
      -

    • GitHub MCP Server

      Xiao-rx
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enables AI agents to directly manage GitHub repositories, including PRs, issues, and code search, using natural language.
      MIT

    • devflow-mcp

      boranesn
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A production-ready MCP server that provides AI assistants with comprehensive GitHub developer tooling including PR analysis, code review, changelog generation, dependency auditing, commit summarization, and refactoring suggestions.
      5 npm
      ISC
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool serves a unique purpose: starting a run, monitoring status, and promoting to production. There is no overlap in functionality.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All names are simple and readable, but there is a slight inconsistency: 'promote' and 'status' are single words while 'work_ticket' is a compound. However, the style is uniform overall.

    Tool Count3/5

    With only 3 tools, the server feels minimal for a deployment pipeline. While it covers the essential steps, additional tools like cancellation or listing runs would be expected for broader utility.

    Completeness3/5

    The tool set covers the core workflow (start, check, promote), but lacks common operations such as canceling a run, retrying, or viewing history. The surface is functional but not comprehensive.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessResponsive

    Resources