mcp-trinv-server
Related Servers
Alternatives to mcp-trinv-server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceAccess French geographic data from IGN (Institut national de l'information géographique et forestière) including cadastral parcels, agricultural land registry, protected natural areas, urban planning zones, and wine appellations through natural language queries.911MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables querying and summarizing French commune information such as postal codes, departments, and regions, and discovering public datasets from sources like geo.api.gouv.fr and data.gouv.fr.5MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceAccess 17M+ geocoded French property transactions (DVF), 22M+ DPE energy ratings, and 20M+ building records via MCP or REST API. Search transactions, market stats, comparables, price trends, rental yield, flip detection, and more.MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceProvides access to French public data through data.gouv.fr, IGN cartographic services (maps, tiles, geographic data), address geocoding, and administrative divisions with demographic information.6-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceAssess natural and technological risks for French addresses or communes using open APIs (Géorisques, Base Adresse Nationale).-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceProvides French address data from DVF, Géorisques, and SSMSI sources, including property prices, risks, and crime statistics.-
TDQS
Scored across 2 tools
The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: one searches for French communes by name fragment, the other searches for cadastral parcels by area within a commune. There is no overlap or ambiguity in their roles.
Both tool names follow the same pattern: 'trinv-' prefix, 'chercher-' verb, and a specific object ('commune' or 'parcelle'). The naming is perfectly consistent and predictable.
With only two tools, the server is slightly under the typical 3-15 range, but the narrow focus on commune and parcel search justifies the minimal count. The tools are well-scoped and each serves a distinct need.
The server covers the core search workflows for its domain: finding communes and then parcels within them. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no direct lookup by INSEE code), but the provided tools enable the primary use cases without dead ends.