startup

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations provide no safety hints (readOnlyHint=false, destructiveHint=false). The description lacks disclosure of side effects, idempotency, or state changes. For a startup tool, it should clarify if it modifies any configuration or just checks.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence, no wasted words, front-loaded with the verb 'Run' and clearly lists the checks.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no output schema and no behavioral annotations, the description is insufficient. It omits what the tool returns (e.g., success/failure), whether it's safe to run repeatedly, and any impact on system state. The listed checks are vague without further context.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

No parameters exist; schema coverage is 100%. Baseline for 0 parameters is 4. The description does not add parameter details, which is acceptable.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool runs startup checks and lists three specific areas: GitHub auth verification, state file validation, and configuration status. It differentiates from siblings like 'check-setup' or 'setup' by being the comprehensive startup routine.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Implied usage as the main startup sequence, but no explicit guidance on when to use this vs alternative tools (e.g., 'check-setup' for partial checks). No exclusions or prerequisites mentioned.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.