open_project
Opens a Vivado project by providing the path to its .xpr project file.
Instructions
Open a Vivado project (.xpr file)
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| project_path | Yes | Path to .xpr project file |
Opens a Vivado project by providing the path to its .xpr project file.
Open a Vivado project (.xpr file)
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| project_path | Yes | Path to .xpr project file |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided. Description does not disclose behavior like overwriting existing session, required permissions, or error handling for invalid paths.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence efficiently conveys the tool's action. Could include more detail without being verbose.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Adequate for a simple open operation, but lacks return value info and no output schema. Could mention that it sets the current project context.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema has 100% coverage with description. The tool description adds no extra meaning beyond what the schema already provides.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states verb 'Open' and resource 'Vivado project (.xpr file)', distinguishing it from siblings like close_project or launch_simulation.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No explicit when-to-use guidance, but the purpose is obvious. No alternative tools mentioned, but context implies it's necessary before most synthesis/implementation actions.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/coreyhahn/vivado_mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server