update-page-version-by-page-id-and-version-id

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full burden, but it only says 'Update a page version'. It fails to disclose permissions, side effects, reversibility, or what specific changes occur, offering minimal behavioral insight beyond implying a write operation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise but under-specified. While it has no wasteful words, it is too short for a tool with 4 parameters and no annotations, making it more of an under-specification than effective conciseness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the absence of annotations and output schema, and only partial schema coverage, the description is insufficient. It does not explain return values, behavioral effects, or parameter roles, leaving significant gaps for the agent.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 50%, with only pageID and versionID having minimal descriptions. The description adds no parameter meaning, failing to clarify the purpose of is_approved and publish_end_date, despite needing compensation for the low coverage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Update a page version' clearly states the verb and resource, and it distinguishes from sibling tools like get-page-version and delete-page-version. However, it does not specify which fields can be updated, limiting specificity.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. There is no mention of prerequisites, recommended contexts, or exclusions, leaving the agent without direction on selecting this tool over related ones.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.