add-page

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must disclose behavioral traits. It gives none: no mention of required permissions, side effects, validation rules, or how the page object is created. The single sentence is entirely insufficient for a creation operation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely terse, but under-specification is not conciseness when key information is omitted. It provides a single generic sentence that fails to earn its place by adding useful context.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a tool with 6 parameters, nested attributes, and no output schema, one sentence is grossly inadequate. The description covers neither the return format nor any constraints, and fails to contextualize the tool among its many sibling tools.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is only 33%, and most parameter meanings are left to their titles. The description adds no explanation for 'name', 'parent', 'attributes', or 'description', and provides no help for the nested attributes object, leaving the agent to guess.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Adds a page object' restates the tool name with minimal added specificity. It identifies the action and resource but does not differentiate this from other 'add' tools beyond the resource name, nor explain what a 'page object' entails.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like add-file, add-group, or add-block-to-page-area. The description doesn't mention prerequisites, use cases, or exclusions, leaving the agent without decision support.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.