getGroups

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must disclose behavior. It only says 'List groups', which implies a read operation but doesn't state permissions, pagination, scope, or response format. No additional behavioral traits are disclosed.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two words, which is extremely concise and front-loaded. However, it is under-specified for a tool with a required nested parameter, so it's not ideal conciseness as it omits necessary context.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple list tool with one required parameter and no output schema, the description only states the core action. It omits the required format parameter, any filtering/scoping, and any distinction from getGroup, making it incomplete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema includes a required pathParams.format with an enum of json/xml, but the description does not mention this parameter at all. With schema description coverage at 0%, the description fails to compensate for the undocumented parameter.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'List groups' clearly states a list operation for a group resource, using a specific verb and noun. It distinguishes from sibling getGroup (singular) by implying plural collection, though it doesn't explicitly say 'all' or 'multiple'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no instructions on when to use this tool versus getGroup or other group tools, and no mention of alternatives or exclusions. Usage must be inferred from the tool name.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.