deleteUser

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full burden of disclosing behavioral traits, but it is completely silent. It does not mention whether deletion is permanent, whether it cascades to related entities, whether special permissions are required, or any other consequences of the operation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely short, but this is under-specification rather than concise quality. Every word simply duplicates the tool name, leaving no room for needed context.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given that this is a destructive operation with no annotations, no output schema, and no parameter descriptions, the description is wholly inadequate. An agent cannot safely or accurately invoke this tool without additional external knowledge.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description does not compensate. The sole parameter pathParams with required nested properties (format, userId) is not explained at all. An agent has no help understanding that format controls response type and userId identifies the target user.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Delete user' is a direct restatement of the tool name, adding no new information. It clearly names the action and resource but fails to distinguish this delete operation from similar sibling tools (e.g., deleteProject, deleteIssue) or clarify the exact scope of 'user' deletion.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool, prerequisites (e.g., permissions or user state), or when to prefer alternatives (e.g., deactivating a user or removing group membership). It neither states exclusions nor names alternative tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.