Skip to main content
Glama
compagnt

ProjectHub MCP Server

by compagnt

update_task

Modify task details by specifying only the fields to change. Supports title, status, priority, dates, tags, assignee, and description.

Instructions

Update a task. Only provided fields are changed. Set assignee_id to 0 to unassign.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
tagsNoTag names, e.g. ["July Release"]. REPLACES existing tags (pass [] to clear). Unknown names are auto-created. Call list_tags first to reuse existing tags.
titleNoUpdated title
statusNoUpdated status
due_dateNoUpdated due date (YYYY-MM-DD) or null to clear
priorityNoUpdated priority
task_uuidYesUUID of the task to update
start_dateNoUpdated start date (YYYY-MM-DD) or null to clear
assignee_idNoUser ID to assign, or 0 to unassign
descriptionNoUpdated description (HTML supported)
project_uuidYesUUID of the project
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Discloses important behavioral traits: partial update semantics and the special case of unassigning. No annotations exist, so the description carries the full burden; but it lacks details on authentication needs, rate limits, or return values.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, front-loaded with the core purpose, no extraneous words. Every sentence adds value.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Covers essential usage and a key behavioral rule. Lacks details on return values or error handling, but given the well-documented schema and simple update operation, it is sufficiently complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. The description adds value by explaining the partial update behavior that applies to all parameters, and reinforces the assignee_id special case.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Update a task' with a specific verb and resource, and the partial update behavior distinguishes it from create_task and delete_task.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides clear context: 'Only provided fields are changed' and a specific usage hint for assignee_id. However, it does not explicitly state when to use this tool over siblings or when not to use it.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/compagnt/projecthub-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server