Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to Omneum

  • A
    license
    B
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Enables AI agents to verify technical claims against supplied evidence, identify unsupported assumptions and contradictions, and recommend the smallest next check before acting.
    5
    MIT

Related Servers

  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Enables agents to search and reference trusted, out-of-band ingested source state, run claim-bound document reviews, validate evidence-status proposals against admissibility guards, and build evidence matrices. It keeps proposal, evidence, admissibility, and adjudication separate so agents can propose epistemic statuses without creating the source facts, page locators, provenance, or missingness records that support them.
    5
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Enables agents to verify their own output mid-task by checking every claim against provided sources, returning supported, partial, unsupported, or contradicted verdicts with exact citations.
    MIT
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Universal Search-First Knowledge Acquisition Plugin for LLMs. Enables real-time web search and deep page browsing via MCP or CLI. Zero-cost, privacy-first, supports DuckDuckGo, Bing, Google, Brave, Wikipedia, Arxiv, YouTube, Reddit and more.
    2
    23 npm
    18 PyPI
    19
    MIT
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Enables coding agents to analyze a repository evidence-first, answering questions as verifiable claims with source evidence, targeted test observations, and reference resolution.
    5
    3
    Apache 2.0
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    Enables agents to classify every claim into evidence tiers (FACT/INFERENCE/SPECULATION/UNVERIFIED) with attached evidence, forcing deterministic, evidence-gated reporting without LLM or network calls.
    MIT

TDQS

A3.9/5.0

Scored across 3 tools

Disambiguation4/5

ping is a clearly distinct health check, and evaluate_voprf vs evaluate_context target very different domains (cryptographic blinding vs. graph-based reliability scoring). The shared 'evaluate_' prefix creates only mild surface similarity, and the descriptions resolve it well.

Naming Consistency4/5

evaluate_voprf and evaluate_context follow a clean verb_noun snake_case pattern. 'ping' is a bare verb with no noun, a minor deviation from the otherwise consistent scheme.

Tool Count4/5

Three tools is at the thin end but reasonable for a narrow, focused cryptographic evaluation service. Each tool (health, VOPRF evaluation, context evaluation) earns its place without redundancy.

Completeness3/5

The core evaluation operations are present, but there is no key/deployment metadata retrieval, batch evaluation, or status/introspection beyond ping. Agents can work around this via the SDK but the surface has notable gaps for a full lifecycle.

Maintenance

ActivityActive
ResponsivenessNo issues