Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
Omneum

Omneum

by cole-h06
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to Omneum

  • Ackrite

    mshanghai570
    A
    license
    B
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Enables AI agents to verify technical claims against supplied evidence, identify unsupported assumptions and contradictions, and recommend the smallest next check before acting.
    5
    MIT

Related Servers

  • PADC Evidence Lab

    HenricTBoehm
    A
    license
    A
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Enables agents to search and reference trusted, out-of-band ingested source state, run claim-bound document reviews, validate evidence-status proposals against admissibility guards, and build evidence matrices. It keeps proposal, evidence, admissibility, and adjudication separate so agents can propose epistemic statuses without creating the source facts, page locators, provenance, or missingness records that support them.
    5
    MIT

  • footnote

    adwitiyashukla
    A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    Enables agents to verify their own output mid-task by checking every claim against provided sources, returning supported, partial, unsupported, or contradicted verdicts with exact citations.
    MIT

  • cross-validated-search

    wd041216-bit
    A
    license
    A
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Universal Search-First Knowledge Acquisition Plugin for LLMs. Enables real-time web search and deep page browsing via MCP or CLI. Zero-cost, privacy-first, supports DuckDuckGo, Bing, Google, Brave, Wikipedia, Arxiv, YouTube, Reddit and more.
    2
    21 npm
    19 PyPI
    20
    MIT

  • Deep Research Fact-Checker

    Alpha-Park
    A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    Not graded
    maintenance
    Enables autonomous agents to cross-reference factual claims against multiple source documents, detect ungrounded or hallucinated statements, and return normalized confidence scores via the verify_claim tool.
    MIT
Deploy Server
One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

TDQS

A3.9/5.0

Scored across 3 tools

Disambiguation4/5

ping is a clearly distinct health check, and evaluate_voprf vs evaluate_context target very different domains (cryptographic blinding vs. graph-based reliability scoring). The shared 'evaluate_' prefix creates only mild surface similarity, and the descriptions resolve it well.

Naming Consistency4/5

evaluate_voprf and evaluate_context follow a clean verb_noun snake_case pattern. 'ping' is a bare verb with no noun, a minor deviation from the otherwise consistent scheme.

Tool Count4/5

Three tools is at the thin end but reasonable for a narrow, focused cryptographic evaluation service. Each tool (health, VOPRF evaluation, context evaluation) earns its place without redundancy.

Completeness3/5

The core evaluation operations are present, but there is no key/deployment metadata retrieval, batch evaluation, or status/introspection beyond ping. Agents can work around this via the SDK but the surface has notable gaps for a full lifecycle.

Maintenance

ActivityActive
ResponsivenessNo recent community issues

Resources