Skip to main content
Glama
coinpaprika

CoinPaprika MCP Server

Official

getTagById

Retrieve details for a cryptocurrency tag (e.g., defi) including its name, description, and counts of coins and ICOs. Optionally get the list of coins and ICOs under that tag.

Instructions

Get details for one CoinPaprika tag (a category such as 'defi' or 'stablecoin'): its id, name, description, coin_counter, ico_counter, and optionally the coins and ICOs grouped under it. Use for 'what coins are in the defi tag', 'show the stablecoin category', 'tokens tagged ai'. To list every tag or find a tagId first use getTags. Read-only. Params: tagId (required) is a tag id from getTags such as 'defi'; additionalFields (optional, default none) is a comma-separated list of extra sections, valid values 'coins' and 'icos' (example 'coins,icos'). An unknown tagId returns an error. No API key required.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
tagIdYesTag ID (e.g., blockchain-service)
additionalFieldsNoComma-separated additional fields (e.g., coins,icos)
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, but description covers read-only nature, parameter details, error behavior, and auth requirements. Missing potential rate limits or response size, but adequate for a simple get tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Concise, front-loaded with purpose, then usage, then parameter details. Every sentence adds value without redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity (2 params, no output schema), the description covers all needed context: return fields, optional fields, error case, and auth. No gaps.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, and the description adds concrete examples ('defi' for tagId, 'coins,icos' for additionalFields) and clarifies valid values, enhancing understanding beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it gets details for one tag by ID, listing returned fields and example use cases. It distinguishes itself from sibling 'getTags' which lists all tags.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly explains when to use (e.g., 'what coins are in the defi tag') and refers to 'getTags' as alternative to find tagId. Also notes read-only, error on unknown tagId, and no API key required.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/coinpaprika/coinpaprika-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server