Skip to main content
Glama
coinpaprika

CoinPaprika MCP Server

Official

getCoinExchanges

List exchanges that list a specific coin. Provide the canonical coin ID to get venue names.

Instructions

List the exchanges that LIST a specific coin (venue names only). Use for 'which exchanges list X', 'is X on Coinbase', 'where is X listed'. For where to BUY with per-market price and volume use getCoinMarkets; for the live price use getTickersById. Read-only; coinId is a canonical id, limit caps results. No API key required.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
limitNoNumber of exchanges to return (default: 50, max: 250)
coinIdYesCanonical CoinPaprika coin slug in 'symbol-name' format, e.g. 'btc-bitcoin', 'eth-ethereum', 'ada-cardano'. Do NOT pass ticker symbols ('BTC', 'AAVE') or guess the slug — it is not derivable from the symbol (e.g. AAVE resolves to 'aave-new', which you could not guess). Call search or resolveId first to resolve a symbol or name to its canonical id.
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries full burden. It states read-only, canonical id format, limit cap, and no auth. Missing error handling details but sufficient for a simple list tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three sentences: purpose, alternatives, behavior/params. No wasted words, front-loaded with core action.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Covers purpose, usage, behavior, parameters, and output scope (venue names only). Complete for a read-only list tool with no output schema.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, baseline 3. Description adds critical guidance on coinId format and warns against ticker symbols, providing examples. For limit, it reiterates cap but adds little beyond schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it lists exchanges listing a specific coin, with specific use case examples. It distinguishes from siblings getCoinMarkets and getTickersById by explicitly naming them.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly states when to use this tool (for 'which exchanges list X') and when to use alternatives (getCoinMarkets, getTickersById). Also notes read-only and no API key required.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/coinpaprika/coinpaprika-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server