Skip to main content
Glama
cohm

indico-mcp

by cohm

search_category_events

Retrieve events within an Indico category, using filters for date range and keyword to locate specific meetings or conferences.

Instructions

List events in an Indico category, optionally filtered by date range and keyword.

Returns a list of events with id, title, type, start/end times, location, and URL. Use get_event_details or get_event_contributions to drill into a specific event.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
category_idNoIndico category ID. Use 0 for the root (all public events).
from_dateNoStart date filter, YYYY-MM-DD.
to_dateNoEnd date filter, YYYY-MM-DD.
keywordNoFilter event titles by this keyword (case-insensitive).
limitNoMaximum number of events to return (default 50, max 1000).
instanceNoNamed Indico instance to query. Use only configured names. If omitted, the server default instance is used.

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
resultYes
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It discloses the return fields and filtering options but doesn't cover pagination, error handling, or performance considerations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three efficient sentences with no fluff: purpose, return fields, and usage guidance.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the presence of an output schema, the description adequately covers filtering, category, and instance semantics, though it omits default behavior for empty results.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3. The description adds minimal extra meaning beyond rephrasing the existing parameter descriptions.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it lists events in a category with optional filters, distinguishing it from sibling tools like find_events_by_title and search_events_by_keyword.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It provides explicit guidance to use get_event_details or get_event_contributions for deeper drill-down, though it doesn't enumerate when not to use the tool.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/cohm/indico-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server