Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to jev-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables agents to call typed code-review and content-moderation decision tools, returning structured verdicts, probabilities, and confidence-gated actions.
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables typed, calibrated judgment calls through classify, score, check, and batched ask tools, each returning full probability distributions for programmatic decisions.
      5
      470 npm
      7
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables agents to get fast, calibrated typed decisions from a shared Laya decision service: classifying text, scoring rubrics, answering batches of yes/no checks, and running question packs. Exposes guards and tool-call helpers that gate proposed tool calls, screen tool results for injected instructions, check replies and input for leaks or jailbreaks, and validate individual form fields and whole submissions with pass, fix, review, or reject outcomes.
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides fast, offline typed decision tools (classify, score, check, triage) to agents via the Model Context Protocol, enabling safe local inference across 100+ languages with calibrated confidence and no text generation.
      8
      78 PyPI
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables typed decisions (yes/no, choice, score) with transparent preflight checks, honest confidence reporting, and health monitoring.
      102 npm
      Apache 2.0

    TDQS

    A4.2/5.0

    Scored across 5 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Each tool targets a distinct decision primitive: categorical selection, ordinal scoring, binary yes/no, action screening, and a combined multi-question call. The only mild ambiguity is that jev_decidee is a superset of the individual question types, and jev_checck and jev_gate both deal with safety-related decisions, but their outputs are clearly different.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow the same jev_<verb> convention with lowercase snake_case names and no mixed styles. The verb choice is consistent with each tool's single responsibility, making the set predictable.

    Tool Count5/5

    Five tools is a well-scoped size for this server: four primitives plus one combined/everytive endpoint. Each tool earns its place and there is no padding or bloat.

    Completeness5/5

    The suite covers the visible decision types (choice, score, yes/no, gate) and the decide tool adds a batched path that also supports the noul type. There are no obvious dead ends or missing operations for the stated purpose.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues