Skip to main content
Glama
codaaiteam

jev-mcp

by codaaiteam
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to jev-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • jev-mcp

      rashedInt32
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables typed, calibrated judgment calls through classify, score, check, and batched ask tools, each returning full probability distributions for programmatic decisions.
      5
      1
      MIT

    • jev-mcp

      jkudish
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables agents to verify claims against cited evidence, screen content for prompt injection and relevance before reading it, and rank candidates by meaning, all with calibrated probability verdicts.
      10
      758 npm
      88
      MIT

    • askjev

      pZacca
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables agents to get fast, calibrated probabilistic answers from Jev (Typesafe AI) to yes/no, scale, or choice questions about provided material, without using a generative model.
      1
      MIT
    • ERDL Guard by OpenOBA

      ERDL Guardofficial

      OpenOBA
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enforces deterministic policy decisions on AI agent tool calls, supporting allow, deny, correct, escalate, and human review actions with verifiable audit receipts.
      200 npm
      MIT

    • sentinel-mcp

      haibaoseal
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables governed tool-calling agents with policy decisions, optional human approval, hash-chained audit logging, and deterministic evaluation.
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.2/5.0

    Scored across 5 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Each tool targets a distinct decision primitive: categorical selection, ordinal scoring, binary yes/no, action screening, and a combined multi-question call. The only mild ambiguity is that jev_decidee is a superset of the individual question types, and jev_checck and jev_gate both deal with safety-related decisions, but their outputs are clearly different.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow the same jev_<verb> convention with lowercase snake_case names and no mixed styles. The verb choice is consistent with each tool's single responsibility, making the set predictable.

    Tool Count5/5

    Five tools is a well-scoped size for this server: four primitives plus one combined/everytive endpoint. Each tool earns its place and there is no padding or bloat.

    Completeness5/5

    The suite covers the visible decision types (choice, score, yes/no, gate) and the decide tool adds a batched path that also supports the noul type. There are no obvious dead ends or missing operations for the stated purpose.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources