papers
Server Configuration
Describes the environment variables required to run the server.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| PAPERS_ADAPTER | No | The adapter to use. Set to 'caseware' to use the Caseware bridge adapter. If omitted, the server starts with no capabilities. |
Instructions
Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.
This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.
Capabilities
Features and capabilities supported by this server
Protocol revision2025-11-25
| Capability | Details |
|---|---|
| tools | {
"listChanged": true
} |
Tools
Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| get_capabilitiesA | Describe the configured adapter and what it supports |
| list_engagementsB | List engagements visible to the adapter |
| get_trial_balanceC | Read a trial balance for an engagement |
| list_review_notesC | Read the review notes on an engagement |
| propose_adjustmentA | Plan an adjusting entry. Defaults to validate: nothing is written unless mode is commit. |
Prompts
Interactive templates invoked by user choice
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No prompts | |
Resources
Contextual data attached and managed by the client
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No resources | |
TDQS
Scored across 5 tools
Each tool targets a distinct resource or action: capabilities, engagements, trial balance, review notes, and adjustments. There is no meaningful overlap between the tools, and the descriptions clearly separate read-only operations from the one planning/write operation.
Tool names follow a consistent verb_noun snake_case pattern: get/list for reads and propose for the adjustment action. This makes the set predictable and easy to navigate.
With five tools, the server is well-scoped for an accounting engagement review workflow. Each tool covers a necessary capability without redundancy or bloat.
The core workflow is covered: discover capabilities, list engagements, inspect trial balance, review notes, and propose adjustments. A minor gap is the lack of a dedicated method to retrieve engagement-level details or view already committed adjustments, but the main workflow is not blocked.