Skip to main content
Glama
papers

papers

by coalesc

Related Servers

Alternatives to papers

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables accountants to connect Xero, read accounting data, analyze, and execute controlled draft operations after explicit confirmation, with Xero as the source of truth.
      -
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients such as Claude Desktop to read and, after per-transaction confirmation, write accounting data—invoices, customers, items, payments, deposits, checks/bank charges, and journal entries—with two-step confirmation and revert of its own runs.
      25
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables MCP-capable clients to read and write directly in epago accounting, including chart of accounts, transactions, invoices, payments, receipts, and tax reports.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to query and manage self-hosted accounting data—invoices, balances, and books—through natural language, with read-only tools by default and optional scoped write operations.
      30
      25 PyPI
      1
      AGPL 3.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables autonomous financial agents and payment webhooks to create and verify immutable double-entry ledger entries, enforce debit-credit balance invariants, and generate hash-chained audit trails with fraud detection.
      7
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to query a connected accounting platform for organisations, invoices, contacts, chart of accounts, and profit-and-loss reports, supporting bookkeeping, AR/AP, and financial reporting workflows.
      299 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.5/5.0

    Scored across 5 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct resource or action: capabilities, engagements, trial balance, review notes, and adjustments. There is no meaningful overlap between the tools, and the descriptions clearly separate read-only operations from the one planning/write operation.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Tool names follow a consistent verb_noun snake_case pattern: get/list for reads and propose for the adjustment action. This makes the set predictable and easy to navigate.

    Tool Count5/5

    With five tools, the server is well-scoped for an accounting engagement review workflow. Each tool covers a necessary capability without redundancy or bloat.

    Completeness4/5

    The core workflow is covered: discover capabilities, list engagements, inspect trial balance, review notes, and propose adjustments. A minor gap is the lack of a dedicated method to retrieve engagement-level details or view already committed adjustments, but the main workflow is not blocked.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo recent community issues