Skip to main content
Glama
coalesc

papers

by coalesc

Related Servers

Alternatives to papers

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables accountants to connect Xero, read accounting data, analyze, and execute controlled draft operations after explicit confirmation, with Xero as the source of truth.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables MCP-capable clients to read and write directly in epago accounting, including chart of accounts, transactions, invoices, payments, receipts, and tax reports.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to query and manage self-hosted accounting data—invoices, balances, and books—through natural language, with read-only tools by default and optional scoped write operations.
      10
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Financial data infrastructure for AI agents. Connect to a startup's books to read live P&L and bank balances, review and reclassify transactions, manage the chart of accounts, and connect banking sources.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables LLMs to query a synthetic general ledger and trial balance through read-only tools for account lookups, GL drill-down, variance analysis, and naive forecasting, with every answer cited to specific transactions or periods.
      33 npm
      MIT
    • F
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to perform financial reconciliation with a deterministic proof engine: intake files, match transactions, verify proofs, resolve exceptions, and sign off on balanced journals under the user's authority.
      21
      -

    TDQS

    A3.5/5.0

    Scored across 5 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct resource or action: capabilities, engagements, trial balance, review notes, and adjustments. There is no meaningful overlap between the tools, and the descriptions clearly separate read-only operations from the one planning/write operation.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Tool names follow a consistent verb_noun snake_case pattern: get/list for reads and propose for the adjustment action. This makes the set predictable and easy to navigate.

    Tool Count5/5

    With five tools, the server is well-scoped for an accounting engagement review workflow. Each tool covers a necessary capability without redundancy or bloat.

    Completeness4/5

    The core workflow is covered: discover capabilities, list engagements, inspect trial balance, review notes, and propose adjustments. A minor gap is the lack of a dedicated method to retrieve engagement-level details or view already committed adjustments, but the main workflow is not blocked.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive